14:45:00 RRSAgent has joined #i18nits 14:45:00 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-irc 14:45:07 meeting: i18n ITS working group 14:45:11 chair: Yves 14:45:15 scribe: Felix 14:45:19 scribeNick: fsasaki 14:45:48 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0140.html 14:48:48 r12a has joined #i18nits 14:55:45 YvesS has joined #i18nits 14:56:11 YvesS has left #i18nits 14:56:51 YvesS has joined #i18nits 15:00:51 zakim, dial felix-home 15:00:51 ok, fsasaki; the call is being made 15:00:52 I18N_TS()10:00AM has now started 15:00:53 +Felix 15:01:56 +Yves_Savourel 15:03:32 +??P20 15:03:51 zakim, ??P20 is Christian 15:03:51 +Christian; got it 15:03:54 zakim, dial ishida 15:03:54 ok, r12a; the call is being made 15:03:56 +Ishida 15:04:42 zakim, mute ishida 15:04:42 Ishida should now be muted 15:05:02 zakim, who is here? 15:05:02 On the phone I see Felix, Yves_Savourel, Christian, Ishida (muted) 15:05:03 On IRC I see YvesS, r12a, RRSAgent, Zakim, fsasaki 15:05:09 chriLi has joined #i18nits 15:05:41 regrets: Sebastian, Andrzej 15:06:21 zakim who is noisy? 15:06:31 zakim, who is using a geiger counter ? 15:06:31 I don't understand your question, r12a. 15:06:33 zakim, who is noisy? 15:06:43 fsasaki, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Felix (24%), Yves_Savourel (37%), Christian (59%) 15:07:29 ok 15:07:34 zakim, unmute ishida 15:07:34 Ishida should no longer be muted 15:07:38 topic: f2f meeting 15:08:02 yves: currently we thought of the two weeks after www conference 15:08:07 .. and the xtech conference 15:08:26 GoutamSaha has joined #i18nits 15:08:59 .. we thought of may 31-2 15:09:14 richard: I might have to attend an SSML workshop 15:09:22 .. I need to get confirmation on this 15:09:43 yves: I don't know if we would have a sponsor for that location 15:09:50 richard: why did you plan that time? 15:10:03 yves: it was hard to commit people for the other two weeks 15:10:36 .. maybe we should wait and see if it is a problem 15:10:43 richard: I will find out asap 15:10:49 topic: action items 15:10:52 zakim, mute ishida 15:10:52 Ishida should now be muted 15:11:00 action: Continue conformance discussion on the mailing list. (ONGOING) 15:11:11 yves: Christian and Felix worked on it 15:11:27 zakim, mute Christian 15:11:27 Christian should now be muted 15:14:13 felix describes the rationale for the mail on conformance 15:14:33 felix: see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0231.html 15:14:52 action items 2,3,4: all done 15:15:03 action: Yves to send something on docbook before the tech plenary to the list. (DONE) 15:15:10 Yves: Norm sent an answer 15:15:48 Felix: Sebastian and me might meet Norm next week 15:16:03 action: All to think of how to organize examples inside and outside the specification. (ONGOING) 15:16:08 Yves: has to do with test suites 15:16:33 ..and related to discussion on editor call, of sharing the examples between the techniques / tagset document 15:16:55 action: Christian and Felix to provide examples for tests, and see if we can come up with a common set of conf level (DROP) 15:17:06 Yves: this is like the other action item above 15:17:22 action: Everybody to read the specification and comment until the publication date. (DONE) 15:17:48 felix: the draft will be published on the 22nd (today) 15:18:01 action: Felix to add a strong statement on the top of the document about "editors" copy. (PENDING) 15:18:10 action: Owners of the modularizations to keep working on them. (ONGOING) 15:18:16 Unmute 15:18:42 christian: as for DITA: 15:18:54 .. I would like to do s.t. similar as Yves has done for DocBook 15:19:09 .. he sent suggestions to Norm as the maintainer of the DocBook schema 15:19:19 .. and asked him if this is the right way to do it 15:19:35 .. I could also suggest at the next DITA sub TC call 15:19:48 .. that somebody from DITA takes ITS and see how it works with DITA 15:20:04 .. in DocBook, you have e.g. specialization layers 15:20:14 .. which might be a challenge for integration of ITS 15:20:25 .. in DITA, you have other schema design issues 15:20:30 yves: good idea 15:20:38 .. you might provide them with something 15:21:23 zakim, mute Christian 15:21:23 Christian should now be muted 15:21:32 .. take an example of DITA+ITS 15:21:43 yves: we have not heard from Damian 15:21:46 .. and open doc 15:21:59 .. I asked him last week, I'll send an reminder next week 15:22:07 yves: I started also s.t. on XHTML 15:22:17 action: Yves to work on XHTML + ITS modularization 15:22:25 yves: the problem with XHTML I had was: 15:22:36 .. as they describe how to have MathML 15:22:47 .. they say that this makes the document invalid 15:23:00 .. I don't know how to address that, but make a note on it 15:23:17 topic: let's go through the current bugs 15:23:22 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=ITS 15:23:59 yves: 2618: proposal from "translateAddinfo" 15:24:05 .. it was from Francois, I think 15:24:13 .. we should address it at some point 15:25:56 felix: we don't have to address this now 15:26:05 .. only if the comment is made during last call 15:26:10 zakim, unmute Christian 15:26:10 Christian should no longer be muted 15:26:21 yves: 2619 Complexity of precedence rules for "scope" (or "selectors") 15:26:30 Christian: on 2618 again: 15:26:40 .. can we not close this one now? 15:27:05 .. is this not a part of translation properties? 15:27:50 action: Felix to close 2618 and write a mail to Francois about it 15:27:59 Christian: I see the same need as Francois sees 15:28:10 .. I only think that this is not the scope of ITS 15:28:31 Yves: we have to make clear that we only address localizability issues, not the localization process 15:28:41 zakim, mute Christian 15:28:41 Christian should now be muted 15:28:58 zakim, who's muted? 15:28:58 I see Christian, Ishida muted 15:30:40 felix: how about closing this, and to go to Francois? 15:30:43 yves: ok. 15:31:02 action: felix to close 2619 and to go back to Francois 15:31:29 yves: 2761: part of conformance discussion 15:31:43 .. 2808: not in the spec, but we have a proposal 15:32:05 s/spec/spec yet 15:32:50 action: felix to write s.t. about comment 2808 in the spec and close the comment 15:33:03 yves: 2876 15:33:07 .. about versioning 15:33:17 .. important issue, where was some discussion 15:33:24 .. how should we address that? 15:33:32 .. there are two parts to that: 15:33:39 .. the version number in the URI 15:33:57 .. and there is version information in the markup 15:34:23 .. the latter could be addressed via namespace differences or an "version" attribute 15:34:55 felix: I would not change the namespace UIR 15:34:59 s/UIR/URI 15:35:03 Yves: seems good 15:35:10 What do the CSS and XSL guys do? 15:35:38 christian: I'm not sure if I am clear about the topic: 15:35:48 .. versioning the spec versus versioning the tag set 15:36:20 yves: I had a confusion about the URI of the spec, versus the URI of the namespace 15:38:05 felix: the versioning story could be only a story of the "ITS markup declaration" product 15:38:19 action: Yves to write s.t. about versioning for the tagset document 15:38:31 Yves: bug 2877 15:38:42 .. the data category 15:39:14 christian: I had a look at dita and docbook 15:39:25 .. and tried to figure out how it works 15:39:35 .. this might concern other data categories as well 15:40:10 .. questions where: should we have in the techniques document s.t. about equivelant markup? 15:40:22 .. e.g. should we go for DITA or ITS markup? 15:40:36 .. that is important for other data categories as well 15:41:25 .. the other point was on how to relate existing terminology markup to ITS markup / the term data category 15:43:39 action: christian to make a bug on the relation between existing markup and data categories 15:43:45 zakim, mute Christian 15:43:45 Christian should now be muted 15:43:57 yves: 2878 15:47:09 .. I will try the same thing for segmentation 15:47:19 felix: how about having deadlines for making progress? 15:48:14 yves: o.k. 15:48:23 felix: will write an inital proposal to yves 15:49:30 yves: bugs 2881,2,3 have been tackled at the editors call 15:50:07 action: tag set editors to integrate discussion result about bugs 2881,2,3 (results from editor's call) into the tagset document 15:50:19 yves: bug 2890 15:50:29 action: felix to integrate bug 2890 into the tag set document 15:50:39 http://esw.w3.org/topic/its0601Techniques 15:50:41 topic: techniques document 15:51:09 yves: I made some change, after Christian's proposal 15:51:22 .. it is more clear, but I still have not managed to put the localizer here 15:51:47 .. I added some entries for ruby etc. 15:51:54 .. currently they are only placeholders 15:52:02 .. most of the entries are currently empty 15:52:13 .. one thing we could discuss: language specification 15:52:19 .. see first item of sec. 2 15:52:22 http://esw.w3.org/topic/its0601TechLangDev 15:53:29 zakim, unmute ishida 15:53:29 Ishida should no longer be muted 15:55:27 felix: how about adding a language attribute to ITS? 15:55:49 richard: the xml:lang attribute definition says "rfc 3066 or its successor" 15:55:56 .. xml:lang exists, and it should be used 15:56:09 .. it is not a vague statement "or its successor" 15:56:24 .. I hope that the IETF will clarify the situation soon 15:56:51 .. we need to check the matching draft though 15:58:45 .. we should not define what the values for our own 16:01:05 action: felix to bring the xml:lang question to the core group (esp. Mark, also Addison) 16:01:29 -Christian 16:02:24 zakim, who is here? 16:02:24 On the phone I see Felix, Yves_Savourel, Ishida 16:02:25 On IRC I see GoutamSaha, YvesS, r12a, RRSAgent, Zakim, fsasaki 16:04:05 Bye, Goodnight everyone 16:26:10 -Felix 16:26:12 -Ishida 16:26:13 -Yves_Savourel 16:26:14 I18N_TS()10:00AM has ended 16:26:15 Attendees were Felix, Yves_Savourel, Christian, Ishida 16:29:46 rrsagent, make log public 16:29:53 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:29:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki 16:57:57 r12a has left #i18nits 17:12:40 exit 17:12:43 YvesS has left #i18nits 18:30:53 Zakim has left #i18nits