<Michael> scribe: Michael

<Andi> Hi Michael

hi Andi

issues for guidelines 2.2, 2.5, 4.2 <http://tinyurl.com/7o7s9>

1108 - agree needs clarification, TTF please do!

1110: suggest general technique about when refresh important and permitted - don't want to forbid e.g., status update functionality

<Andi> scribe: Andi

1243: Recommend considering technique submitted by Sofia http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Using_script_to_deactivate_blinking_content

1249: Agree with comments in issue. No changes necessary.

1251: dup of 1243

1243: Also consider technique documented in the issue

1274: OBE - no longer have SC having to do with following specifications.

1819: reject - it's a good idea to define a standard way for users to disable blinking but this is out of scope for WCAG.

1884: from security perspective, always require server-side validation. From accessibility perspective, though, requiring ssv is out of scope. It is a good idea to have server side validation techniques though so we recommend adding one. Client side or server side validation should be sufficient depending on the baseline.

1885: Recommend adding as an optional technique

1886: reject - the best way to identify errors could depend on context. We've done what we think we should in the SC and don't recommend any additional standardization.

1887: disagree with 1st paragraph - if provide error notification in an accessible way as errors occur, this could really benefit people with disabilities
... disagree with 2nd paragraphy - links to fields in errors is a good idea but should not be forced upon all forms
... also recommend rejecting suggestion in 3rd paragraph - doesn't fit the SC.

1889: reject - 2.5.1 does not require providing suggestions to correct the error. That's the fundamental difference between 2.5.2 and 2.5.1.

1890: investigate further - if popup window is a change of context, then remove the techniques. But if it is not a change of context, this should be allowed as it is similar to popups for logging in.

would be good if team members could look through wiki for 2.1, 2.2, 2.5, and 4.2 inserting notes if appropriate or starting a discussion on the mailing list.

<Michael> meeting: WCAG Team C teleconference

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.127  of Date: 2005/08/16 15:12:03  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: Michael
Inferring ScribeNick: Michael
Found Scribe: Andi
Inferring ScribeNick: Andi
Scribes: Michael, Andi
ScribeNicks: Michael, Andi
Default Present: Michael_Cooper, Sofia_Celic, Andi_Snow_Weaver, [IPcaller], Tim_Boland, Makoto_Ueki
Present: Michael_Cooper Sofia_Celic Andi_Snow_Weaver [IPcaller] Tim_Boland Makoto_Ueki
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teamc/2006Jan/0035.html
Got date from IRC log name: 16 Jan 2006
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2006/01/16-wcag-teamc-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.