See also: IRC log
<dwood> PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 12 December 2005 telecon:
ralph: the action items might not be proper
... suggest accept them and revise them later
dwood: second ralph
... no objection
dwood: jacco, any comments?
... about httpRange-14
Jacco: no further commentss besides what have been said
<Zakim> RalphS, you wanted to note connection with VM deliverable
ralph: worry about having a new doc now but we should record what people say
dbooth: second ralph
... and would like to help
... some clarification might be good
dwood: are you willing to propose it in the mailing list?
dbooth: yep
ACTION: DBooth to propose TAG clarification questions around httpRange-14 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action01]
Jacco: basically I don't have problem with Describe but don't think it should be in the core language
Jeremy: not been done
Elisa: I saw an email from Gary
... and I will contact Jeremy and make sure he gets the correct chapter
ACTION: garyng and jeremy to review OWL chapter of ODM review by 9 jan 2006 [http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action06] [PENDING]
<RalphS> Review of WSDL 2.0 - RDF Mapping [DBooth 2005-12-22]
dbooth: the mapping doc is mostly not done
... so more reviews are needed once the mapping doc is done
Elisa: even the ontology is also partially
done
... agree with dbooth
<PhilT> Good point...I agree
dwood: anyone knows the schedule?
dbooth: don't know
<RalphS> kudos to DBooth for his review
dwood: will check with bijan
Aliman: previously port TF was not planning to
do the 3rd round of publications
... but if we can expect an extension of the the WG
... we can try
<dwood> Elisa will take over from Chris as OEP TF co-chair
Deb: actions items, JeffP sent a review
... the next step is to ...
... I agree with ...
... the review of .. is continuing
the action item by JeffP is complete
<jeremy> sorry my review of qcr is still to do,please contiinue action
ralph: I propose to drop Dan's action
Deb: I am fine with it
dwood: what's the plan for the next month for OEP?
Deb: should check with Chris
... give me an atction
ACTION: Deb to report the plan of OEP [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action03]
<Elisa> nothing more from me, thnks
<RalphS> it appears to me that DanBri's action to investigate spatial relations work in SWIG came from the Galway f2f http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0144.html
Jeremy: needs to talk to JeffP about the different opinions
JeffP We more or less agree on what is needed.
<RalphS> 12-December meeting record records "[DONE] ACTION: jeremy to contact jeff re resolving the XSD issues"
<RalphS> apparently Jeremy feels this action is still PENDING
<RalphS> ACTION: [PENDING] jeremy to contact jeff re resolving the XSD issues [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action04]
JeffP: I will email Jeremy to arrange phone conversation about this.
Ralph: having some way to include the rational from the cookbook would be good
aliman: agree with ralph
... still half way reading the doc
Ralph: can we publish the draft next
telecon?
... we had two reviewers
dbooth: ralph changes the doc after my review
<aliman> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0004.html review from andreas, forwarded by tomB
Ralph: you should wait till later version
ben: We have produced a new draft; the doc is available today
Ralph: GaryNG and Dbooth to review it
Ben: the goal of the doc is the one doc
published through this task force in the WG
... the other doc will move to the html WG(?)
dwood: any comments?
Ben: people send them to the mailing list too
dwood: action items?
Jeremy: my action is not done
Ralph: during the mail conversation, there will
be no change of doc status
... the WG approves the draft is now a WG note
... it has been discussed in previous meeting
dwood: I remember the WG agree to it
Ralph: I was not present in the meeting
<RalphS> incomplete meeting records regarding rdftm-survey document transition
Ralph: we can reapprove it
dwood: resolved, no objection
<RalphS> PROPOSE: WG transition http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdftm-survey-20050329/ to WG Note status
Ralph: there will be no changes in the contents
dwood: resolved the above proposal
<RalphS> my query to Valentina
Ralph's action item is done
<RalphS> Valentina's reply
dwood: I will propose a precedure to close the WG (to Guus and Ralph)
Ralph: that will be fine
dwood: can we discuss that at the end, Jeremy?
Jeremy: no problem
Phil: we have gone through a final review of
the OO Primer
draft
... and we ask for WG publishment
... we had some feedback from Grady
<Elisa> I also provided feedback on this one ... and my comments were addressed
Phil: which are more about the context
Elisa: I review on behalf of the WG
dwood: we want to make sure all the comments are satisfied
<RalphS> [SE] comments on primer [Jeremy 2005-11-15]
Ralph: propose to accept it on condition that Jeremy checks his comments
dwood: resolved
<RalphS> PROPOSE to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/SE/ODSD/20051217/ as a WG Note contingent upon Jeremy's satisfaction with response to his review
resolved
action of Guus is dropped
Jacco: we asked Guus to do the second review
Jacco: it is half review, mostly editorial
<RalphS> [MM] Review (partial): Image annotation on the Semantic Web [Guus 2006-01-09]
Jacco: should wait for the second half
... and then do the change and propose to change its status
Jacco: the question is if we can have a conditional approval
dwood: who is the first reviewer?
Jacco: Mike
dwood: I prefer we have two full reviews
... do we have any more reviews?
Jacco: no
Jacco: I sent a call for requirements
<RalphS> (ACTION Ralph to cite relevant CG meeting records regarding SemWeb Education & Outreach discussions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/05-swbp-minutes.html#action04]
<RalphS> -- this came from the f2f
Jacco: to describe multimedia ontologies
dwood: if the TF wants the WG have a position,
then have a TF position first
... then send it to the WG
Jacco: or shall we give a personal opinions
dwood: up to the TF
<GiorgosStamou> Ok thanks, it is clear
<Jacco_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Dec/0126.html
<chalaschek> Jan. 24
Ralph: deadline is Jan 24
... it is not practical to have WG position
<GiorgosStamou> we can ask for an extension
Ralph: if we can have an extension and the TF
believes it is critical to have a WG position
... I am inclined to send personal comments
<GiorgosStamou> OK
<chalaschek> ok with me
Jacco: agreed since it is not crucial
Jeff: fine
<GiorgosStamou> Action by Gus is partially done
<GiorgosStamou> thanks Jacco
dwood: AOB
... procedure comments from Jeremy
Jeremy: the world view task force TF was closed by the simple process of a proposal from a WG member, and voted on by WG.. Obviously with adequate notice
Ralph: there is a TP in France; last week of Feb and first week of march
<RalphS> 27 Feb - March 3 Tech Plenary
Ralph: Mar 2-3 for SWBPD
<jeremy> which other WG conflict: DAWG, RIF?
Ralph: both Guus and David could not be there
<RalphS> one option is for March 2 & 3 to be a joint SWBPD and SWIG meeting
Jeff: no conflict with RIF
<RalphS> Member Events Calendar
$Log: 09-swbp-minutes.html,v $ Revision 1.2 2006/01/23 00:32:52 swick Cleanup script-generated draft, copy unaddressed actions forward from agenda.