ISSUE-240: Remove requirement of validity to self-declared DTD
validityToDeclaredDTD
Remove requirement of validity to self-declared DTD
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- mobileOK Basic tests
- Raised by:
- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
- Opened on:
- 2008-03-13
- Description:
- validity to self-declared DTD is problematic for implementations:
* it requires having SGML validation in checkers (for non XML versions of HTML)
* it requires downloading DTDs from unknown locations when a page uses a non-standard doctype.
We could:
* remove that test (given that we already have a fairly stringeant test of XHTML Basic validity)
* replace it by requiring that step only when the System ID matches a well-known DTD (which would be listed in the spec) - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- RE: Latest thoughts about ISSUE-240 (DTD Validation) (from miguel.garcia@fundacionctic.org on 2008-04-22)
- Re: Latest thoughts about ISSUE-240 (DTD Validation) (from srowen@google.com on 2008-04-18)
- RE: Latest thoughts about ISSUE-240 (DTD Validation) (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2008-04-18)
- Re: Latest thoughts about ISSUE-240 (DTD Validation) (from chaals@opera.com on 2008-04-18)
- Re: Latest thoughts about ISSUE-240 (DTD Validation) (from srowen@google.com on 2008-04-17)
- Latest thoughts about ISSUE-240 (DTD Validation) (from miguel.garcia@fundacionctic.org on 2008-04-17)
- [minutes] Thursday 17 April 2008 Teleconf (from fd@w3.org on 2008-04-17)
- Re: mobileOK basic issues (from jeffs@it.rit.edu on 2008-04-17)
- RE: mobileOK basic issues (from miguel.garcia@fundacionctic.org on 2008-04-17)
- RE: mobileOK basic issues (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2008-04-16)
- RE: mobileOK basic issues (from k.scheppe@telekom.de on 2008-04-16)
- Re: mobileOK basic issues (from srowen@google.com on 2008-04-15)
- mobileOK basic issues (from dom@w3.org on 2008-04-14)
- RE: ISSUE-240: Remove requirement of validity to self-declared DTD [mobileOK Basic tests] (from ignacio.marin@fundacionctic.org on 2008-03-13)
- Re: ISSUE-240: Remove requirement of validity to self-declared DTD [mobileOK Basic tests] (from srowen@google.com on 2008-03-13)
- RE: ISSUE-240: Remove requirement of validity to self-declared DTD [mobileOK Basic tests] (from ignacio.marin@fundacionctic.org on 2008-03-13)
- RE: ISSUE-240: Remove requirement of validity to self-declared DTD [mobileOK Basic tests] (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2008-03-13)
- [minutes] Thursday 13 February 2008 Teleconf (from dom@w3.org on 2008-03-13)
- ISSUE-240: Remove requirement of validity to self-declared DTD [mobileOK Basic tests] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-03-13)
Related notes:
(this should probably be resolved for 1.0)
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux, 28 Mar 2008, 10:05:05This was resolved (we only require validity to some well-known DTDs), see:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20080610/#CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT
Display change log