See also: IRC log
<ericP> Scribe: KendallC
<ericP> andy, want to start up early and chat a bit?
the 4 level headings are a pain, IMO. how about promoting some stuff so there are only 4 levels, ericp?
<AndyS> Partial regrets: AndyS here until 15:00Z only
<JanneS> I'm trying to call in - problems with skype (again). I'll be muted most of the time due to baby-sitting I have to do in parallel.
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0229.html minutes 15 Nov
ammendment: Souripriya Das was there
<ericP> hey!
<ericP> i was using that phone...
RESOLVED to approve minutes 15 Nov, noting older actions might be missing
<kendallclark> FWIW, I would have sent regrets if not for scribing. :>
<kendallclark> not feeling well
"29 Nov conflicts with a W3C staff meeting where DanC and EricP are expected; cancel?"
RESOLUTION: to cancel 29 Nov.
6 Dec conflicts with a TAG meeting; EricP to chair? scribe volunteer?
<kendallclark> 6 Dec conflicts with TAG meeting
<kendallclark> EricP chairing
<kendallclark> EliasT to scribe (with KC backing)
RESOLUTION: to meet next 6 Dec; ericp to chair; regrets DanC; Elias to scribe (or find scribe)
(hmm... should archive a text copy)
<kendallclark> I'm happy leaving that to various language communities, say.
<kendallclark> EricP prefers to mention APIs (in the protocol spec, presumably)
<kendallclark> Not mentioning API conformance doesn't help anyone, according to EricP
perhaps: Note that the SPARQL protocol describes an abstract interface as well as a network protocol, and the abstract interface may apply to APIs as well as network interfaces.
<AndyS> Conformance for SPARQL/Q = all of the doc ? DanC's text just moves that to via the protocol. Eric's use of "successful" really applies to a query *request* because it says "processed"
<kendallclark> can we move past what Eric wrote?
replay:
perhaps: Note that the SPARQL protocol describes an abstract interface as well as a network protocol, and the abstract interface may apply to APIs as well as network interfaces.
<kendallclark> (Late arriving regrets from YoshioF)
perhaps: apply to APIs or software modules ...
hasta, AndyS
<scribe> ACTION: DanC to ask DaveB about turtle (in progress; almost done) [CONTINUES]. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/22-dawg-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: AndyS to update rq23 to reflect double => decimal progress/done. test impact? [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/22-dawg-minutes.html#action02]
<kendallclark> Going to webmaster today or tomorrow
<scribe> ACTION: EricP to solicit review of SPARQL mime type(s) in ietf-types, esp after next QL pub [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/22-dawg-minutes.html#action03]
<ericP> http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype
<ericP> [[
<ericP> When doing the W3C Last Call announcement: Send an email to the mailing list ietf-types@iana.org asking for comments on the Media Type section of your specification:
<ericP> ]]
ugh... should say "at or before"
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Nov/0041 Double binding of a WSDL 2.0 operation
[[
The suggested work-round is to provide two separate HTTP bindings,
and therefore two separate endpoints, one for each HTTP method.]
]]
(don't expect The Director to do technical review, btw; The Director's job is to assess consensus once the community has done technical review.)
<scribe> ACTION: [DONE] DanC to notifty DAWG of WSDL response to our WSDL comments. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/22-dawg-minutes.html#action04]
<scribe> ACTION: KendallC to propose revised WSDL descripton of SPARQL protocol [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/22-dawg-minutes.html#action05]
<scribe> ACTION: KC to review sparql-types for xs:any weirdness, w.r.t. WSDL 2.0 constraints [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/22-dawg-minutes.html#action06]
<scribe> ACTION: KendallC to remove uses of "my" in URIs in protocol spec [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/22-dawg-minutes.html#action07]
<scribe> ACTION: KendallC to add a modified version of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#security to protocol editor's draft, as well as a pointer to the section in rq23 itself [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/22-dawg-minutes.html#action08]
<scribe> ACTION: EricP to coordinate W3C staff input on privacy section [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/22-dawg-minutes.html#action09]
<scribe> ACTION: PatH to review The Semantics of SPARQL [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/22-dawg-minutes.html#action10]
<scribe> ACTION: PatH to sketch tests that characterize impact of semantics work [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/22-dawg-minutes.html#action11]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#rdfSemantics
<kendallclark> Which is super helpful of him, ;>
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Sep/0036 pfps's comment, including test case sketch
PatH will tell us how that test works
<kendallclark> there's no normal xml!
<kendallclark> i think it's in 3 weeks, dan :>
ADJOURN.
<kendallclark> ADJOURNED
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.127 of Date: 2005/08/16 15:12:03 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: DanC Found Scribe: KendallC WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: AndyS Andy_Seaborne DanC EliasT Elias_Torres IPcaller JanneS JosD Jos_De_Roo Kendall_Clark LeeF P3 PatH ammendment ericP inserted kendallclark perhaps replay You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Regrets: Jeen_Broekstra Steve_Harris Lee_Feigenbaum Libby_Miller Enrico_Franconi Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda Got date from IRC log name: 22 Nov 2005 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2005/11/22-dawg-minutes.html People with action items: andys danc ericp kc kendallc path[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]