See also: IRC log
---
---
AP: Mary does some document work
... document is in good shape to proceed to first WD
http://www.w3.org/International/core/ws-i18n/ws-i18n.html
link to current document
.. editors: Addison and Mary
RI editor's copy should be set in the xml source
... AP should add that in the role attributte of the spec
element
... document should not look like a the WD until publishing
FS: date of publishing?
AP: today would be date of approval, publishing of course later
RI: examples don't follow the current style guidelines
... I put a link into IRC for that
... (RI
describes the style guide for i18n)
http://www.w3.org/International/xmlspec/002/documentation/xmlspec-i18n-dtd
<r12a> also http://www.w3.org/International/xmlspec/002/documentation/styleguide.html
fs: would like to have one more week to look at the document
ap: we should publish soon
felix: we will publish soon
--
Felix will create a shell for a document on LangLoc
in 2 - 3 weeks
AP: I will ping Francois about the charmod norm draft
... draft made no progess for a long time
...
volunteers for editing?
Ri: would like to, but busy
... f2f meeting would help to do such work
AP: we need to plan a f2f
fs: how about tech plenary?
AP: we need to make progress
RI: There is not many people who can do initial editing, only Francois, Tex, AP, RI
... resource identifier
part of char spec needs also progress
AP: I talked with Martin about that
RI: we made no progress so far
AP: I will contact Martin about char model - identifier spec
http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guidelines/
FS: to look at the public tag minutes if they have already a set of comments, and see if we can comment until next week wednesday as well
--
<r12a> felix, can you add a link to your comments
http://www.w3.org/International/2005/05/xlink1-1-review.html
fs: describes the comments
RI: on comment 2: bidi, language markup is a better example than ruby
fs: will add these
RI: on comment 7: make a generic unicode reference, see charmod
FS: I will use the wording in char mod, i.e. "please use a generic ref. of the unicode standard, as described in the char mod" (point them to char mod)
--
mail about the topic: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2005JulSep/0102.html
AP: Describes the xmllang issue
... we have talked to qt people to make sure that they recognize the scope
problem
... in the faq, there is a sidebare which says: be careful that xml:lang has scope
... we have been said that could create problems
during xml, e.g. as you merge elements
e.g. what to do with elements which have no xml:lang element, but are inside one with xml:lang?
ri: we have the same problem with RDF
ap: right
... my reaction: I said to Sandy that he is right, and that we paid attention to this in the
past
... if we had an official position about this, we should put that into a document
ri: I would love (somebody) to do that
fs: I would love to do that
ap: put that please into a new wiki
--
ap: please have a look at the wiki and send comments to our list, or wiki the comments directly into the document
http://esw.w3.org/topic/i18nFAQTimeZone
RI: if you start a new wiki, start with i18n again
... we need to add access rights to stop spamers
AP: would like to send this of until next meeting, so please make comments until friday
RI: felix to put action items on the top of the notes