IRC log of dawg on 2005-04-26

Timestamps are in UTC.

14:29:05 [RRSAgent]

RRSAgent has joined #dawg

14:29:05 [RRSAgent]

logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc

14:29:09 [Zakim]

+Yoshio

14:29:12 [ericP]

can anyone hear me?

14:29:38 [Zakim]

+Jeen_Broekstra

14:29:48 [Zakim]

-EricP

14:29:58 [ericP]

zakim, please dial hugo-617

14:29:58 [Zakim]

ok, ericP; the call is being made

14:30:00 [Zakim]

+Hugo

14:30:07 [ericP]

testing?

14:30:20 [ericP]

myabe there's a mute button somewhere on this strange device

14:30:28 [DanC]

Zakim, who's muted?

14:30:28 [Zakim]

I see no one muted

14:30:34 [Zakim]

+Kendall_Clark

14:31:12 [ericP]

i have the phone wires in my teeth, actually

14:31:26 [DanC]

Regrets: JosD, Howard, Alberto, KevinW

14:31:32 [DanC]

Zakim, take up agendum 1

14:31:32 [Zakim]

agendum 1. "Convene, take roll, review records and agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0165.html" taken up [from DanC]

14:31:37 [DanC]

Regrets: JosD, Howard, Alberto, KevinW

14:31:43 [DanC]

Zakim, who is on the phone?

14:31:43 [Zakim]

On the phone I see DaveB, AndyS, DanC, Yoshio, Jeen_Broekstra, Hugo, Kendall_Clark

14:32:05 [kendall]

Eric's $1 cellphone is fun till it starts shocking him!

14:32:51 [Zakim]

+[IBM]

14:33:31 [DanC]

(auditing http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who ... missing Bijan. odd.)

14:33:40 [Yoshio]

hi

14:34:29 [ericP]

who is [IBM] ?

14:34:35 [SteveH]

jakim, whos on the phone?

14:34:37 [SteveH]

zakim, whos on the phone?

14:34:37 [Zakim]

I don't understand your question, SteveH.

14:34:45 [kendall]

+1

14:34:51 [SteveH]

ericP, [IBM] might be me

14:35:09 [ericP]

last weeks minutes approved

14:35:19 [Zakim]

Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Jeen_Broekstra

14:35:20 [SteveH]

zakim, mute me

14:35:22 [Zakim]

sorry, SteveH, I do not see a party named 'SteveH'

14:35:23 [Zakim]

Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Hugo

14:35:28 [Zakim]

Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Kendall_Clark

14:35:39 [ericP]

zakim, Hugo is really EricP

14:35:39 [Zakim]

+EricP; got it

14:35:44 [DanC]

scribe next week: KendallC/DanC

14:36:18 [DanC]

Zakim, next agendum

14:36:18 [Zakim]

agendum 2. "issue: fromUnionQuery" taken up [from DanC]

14:36:55 [DanC]

looking at 1.31 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/

14:36:55 [Zakim]

+??P30

14:37:01 [ericP]

for the record, continued actions:

14:37:02 [ericP]

ACTION: KendallC to work out remaining details in sparqlx.{rnc,xsd,rng}: expression syntax, order-by stuff (xmlAbstractSyntax)

14:37:05 [ericP]

ACTION: AndyS to define a term for abstract form of SPARQL query

14:37:08 [ericP]

ACTION: PatH to internal review of rq23

14:37:10 [ericP]

ACTION: SteveH to prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no deadline/urgency)

14:37:13 [ericP]

ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple

14:37:16 [ericP]

ACTION: EricP to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page

14:37:18 [ericP]

ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve

14:37:21 [ericP]

ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery)

14:37:28 [JanneS]

JanneS has joined #dawg

14:37:33 [ericP]

KendallC: HTTP binding spec is fluid. attribute names changing.

14:38:12 [ericP]

... parts not dependent on that are all done.

14:38:41 [ericP]

... went with 1 default graph and one or more named graphs

14:38:54 [SteveH]

zakim, unmute me

14:38:54 [Zakim]

sorry, SteveH, I do not see a party named 'SteveH'

14:39:17 [JanneS2]

JanneS2 has joined #dawg

14:39:21 [kendall]

Andy's proposal, as I understood it, was for 1 default graph and for zero or more named graphs.

14:40:02 [JanneS2]

(sorry for joining late, the unknown ID would be me)

14:40:19 [ericP]

DanC: steve, what if you get only one background graph?

14:40:47 [AndyS]

Minor - can there be zero default graph URIs?

14:41:05 [ericP]

Steve: need to read the proposal

14:41:26 [AndyS]

Not sure it makes a huge difference. Might default to empty??

14:41:35 [ericP]

KendallC: I understood 0 or more BG and 0 or more named at the end of the last Telecon

14:41:38 [Yoshio]

q+ to ask can one ask the server what is used as the background graph?

14:42:12 [ericP]

... I understood Andy's modification to be a simplification

14:42:36 [kendall]

It works for me to have zero background graphs

14:42:51 [Janne]

Janne has joined #dawg

14:42:55 [ericP]

q+ to say the critical issue to me is whether i can do prov queries on the BG graph

14:43:32 [ericP]

ACTION: EricP to try out the "2 list of URIs" datasets design from <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0440.html>

14:43:43 [ericP]

CONTINUED

14:46:03 [ericP]

KendallC: I'm confident that what we express what we want in HTTP. not sure what the exact bytes are for the WSLD HTTP binding.

14:46:28 [ericP]

DanC: you use a complex type. iirc, the HTTP GET binding only specifies simple types.

14:46:42 [kendall]

This is what I'm talking about:

14:46:43 [kendall]

http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-bindings-20040803/#_operation_styles

14:47:16 [DaveB]

seems to me it's way to early to be using wsdl2 here, when it takes 10 mins to write an http binding for sparql

14:47:30 [DanC]

ok? ACTION KendallC: ask WSD WG for clarification about HTTP binding of WSDL2, esp lists of URIs

14:47:45 [ericP]

EricP: there are two open source WSDL 2.0 impls at apache

14:48:14 [DanC]

ACTION KendallC: ask WSD WG for clarification about HTTP binding of WSDL2, esp lists of URIs

14:48:51 [DanC]

Zakim, next agendum

14:48:51 [Zakim]

agendum 3. "issue: wsdlAbstractProtocol" taken up [from DanC]

14:49:09 [ericP]

i believe all three actions are in RRSAgents brain

14:49:16 [kendall]

btw, it's the xs:choice between SparqlX and xs:string forms of the query that is at issue

14:49:28 [ericP]

ACTION: KendallC to own wsdlAbstractProtocol (based on WSDL description added to protocol to editor's draft).

14:49:46 [DanC]

(blending with next agendum)

14:49:54 [Zakim]

-Jeen_Broekstra

14:50:01 [jeen]

crap

14:50:24 [ericP]

ACTION: KendallC to incorporate EricP's privacy text, salting to taste

14:50:52 [Zakim]

+ +1.313.346.aaaa

14:51:37 [kendall]

this bit:

14:51:38 [kendall]

<xs:choice>

14:51:38 [kendall]

<xs:element ref="sparqlx:rdf-query"></xs:element>

14:51:38 [kendall]

<xs:element ref="sparql-query"></xs:element>

14:51:39 [kendall]

</xs:choice>

14:52:05 [DanC]

<output messageLabel="Out" element="st:query-result">

14:53:59 [jeen]

ack

14:54:09 [ericP]

AndyS: would like to see the protocol spec aligned with DaveB's result set syntax

14:55:10 [ericP]

... outer tag is called <sparql>

14:55:22 [ericP]

... <result/> is used elsewhere

14:56:07 [ericP]

KendallC: will fix before publication

14:56:46 [DanC]

ack danc

14:56:46 [Zakim]

DanC, you wanted to ask for an example of a SELECT, a CONSTRUCT, and an ASK

14:57:28 [ericP]

... what's harder is that the result is a choice between to elements

14:57:48 [ericP]

DanC: i think you need two interfaces

14:58:01 [DaveB]

q+

14:58:41 [ericP]

... make your best guess. this is what you want the community to review.

14:58:59 [DanC]

ack yoshio

14:58:59 [Zakim]

Yoshio, you wanted to ask can one ask the server what is used as the background graph?

15:00:07 [DanC]

[[

15:00:07 [DanC]

_:factBookService

15:00:07 [DanC]

saddle:dataSet <...fact-book-part-1.rdf>, <...fact-book-part-2.rdf>.

15:00:08 [DanC]

]]

15:00:13 [ericP]

yoshio: [above Q: +] can we use sadl to ask about the BG names

15:01:02 [ericP]

danc: there is a notion of a saddle data set

15:01:31 [DanC]

yes, http://www.w3.org/2005/03/saddle/# is 404 unfortunately

15:02:03 [ericP]

yoshio: is namespace .../# acceptable?

15:02:36 [ericP]

DanC: not aware of any prob.

15:03:00 [ericP]

EricP: http://www.w3.org/2005/03/saddle/#somethingClever is serializable as a qname

15:03:36 [kendall]

(ok, fwiw, the misalignment with results format is fixed, now...in version 1.32)

15:04:00 [ericP]

(too bad, could have used it to get good ACTION karma)

15:04:05 [kendall]

:>

15:04:50 [DanC]

ACTION Yoshio: edit saddle descriptions provided by KendallC

15:04:55 [kendall]

ACTION kendall: uncommment saddle stuff, email to list

15:05:25 [SteveH]

SteveH has joined #dawg

15:06:51 [DaveB]

q-

15:06:51 [DanC]

ACTION DanC: generate SELECT, CONSTRUCT, ASK protocol traces

15:06:58 [DanC]

ack ericp

15:06:58 [Zakim]

ericP, you wanted to say the critical issue to me is whether i can do prov queries on the BG graph

15:07:01 [kendall]

oh, come on, we all know you don't *really* care about rules! :>

15:07:51 [DaveB]

I was just going to give info, I won't be using this protocol draft without an http section with examples in it

15:08:47 [DanC]

PROPOSED: to publish protocol WD, contingent on inclusion of HTTP examples, saddle examples

15:08:49 [ericP]

DanC: any problem with publishing SPARQL protocol on Fri?

15:09:00 [DanC]

PROPOSED: to publish protocol WD, contingent on inclusion of HTTP examples, saddle prose

15:09:24 [ericP]

DaveB: not useful to me unless there are HTTP examples.

15:10:06 [kendall]

yoshio: w3c's rules workshop is this week, Wed & Thur, in DC.

15:10:15 [ericP]

DanC: critical path: KendallC, YoshioF, EricP, DanC

15:10:21 [ericP]

RESOLVED

15:10:52 [kendall]

which namespace is 404?

15:11:00 [DanC]

Zakim, next agendum

15:11:00 [Zakim]

agendum 4. "protocol publication candidate" taken up [from DanC]

15:11:05 [DanC]

Zakim, close agendum 4

15:11:05 [Zakim]

agendum 4 closed

15:11:06 [Zakim]

I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is

15:11:07 [Zakim]

5. SPARQL Query Results XML Format [from DanC]

15:11:08 [DanC]

Zakim, next agendum

15:11:08 [Zakim]

agendum 4 was just opened, DanC

15:11:21 [DanC]

Zakim, take up item 4

15:11:21 [Zakim]

agendum 4. "protocol publication candidate" taken up [from DanC]

15:11:34 [kendall]

well, even funnier for DanC not to really care about, which I what I meant (smart-assedly, to be sure)

15:11:47 [kendall]

s/I what/is what/

15:13:39 [kendall]

ISSUE: Normativeness of the XML schemas. Pick one?

15:15:10 [ericP]

namespace <http://www.w3.org/2005/03/saddle/#> no longer a 404

15:15:57 [ericP]

AndyS: given streaming requirents, you might want to say whether it's ordered

15:16:15 [DaveB]

monotonicalliy increasing index integers

15:16:16 [ericP]

DaveB: will add that it's monotonically increasing

15:16:22 [DaveB]

2.3.3 editorial note

15:16:25 [DaveB]

4 also re schemas

15:18:14 [ericP]

DanC: it would be nice to publish the results wiht protocol

15:18:19 [DanC]

PROPOSED: to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ 1.25 + editorial notes from DaveB

15:18:43 [ericP]

RESOLVED

15:19:03 [DanC]

Zakim, next agendum

15:19:03 [Zakim]

agendum 5. "SPARQL Query Results XML Format " taken up [from DanC]

15:19:14 [DanC]

Zakim, close agendum 5

15:19:14 [Zakim]

agendum 5 closed

15:19:15 [Zakim]

I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is

15:19:16 [Zakim]

6. issue: valueTesting [from DanC]

15:19:18 [DanC]

Zakim, take up item 6

15:19:18 [Zakim]

agendum 6. "issue: valueTesting" taken up [from DanC]

15:20:28 [kendall]

zakim, mute me

15:20:29 [Zakim]

Kendall_Clark should now be muted

15:21:20 [ericP]

ACTION: DaveB to work with EricP to clarify valueTesting proposal

15:21:22 [ericP]

CONTINUED

15:21:30 [ericP]

ACTION: EricP to propose a test re "x"^^mytype != "y"^^mytpe

15:21:32 [ericP]

CONTINUED

15:23:46 [DanC]

ACTION DanC: send comment on non-use of <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes> to schema comments list

15:25:00 [ericP]

scribe is losing a lot of audio. please back me up by scribing important things you notice

15:25:20 [DanC]

Zakim, close this item

15:25:20 [Zakim]

agendum 6 closed

15:25:21 [Zakim]

I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is

15:25:22 [Zakim]

7. issue: sort [from DanC]

15:25:23 [DanC]

agenda?

15:25:23 [ericP]

AndyS: EricP, is the spec alligned with your head?

15:25:32 [kendall]

zakim, unmute me

15:25:32 [Zakim]

Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted

15:25:43 [AndyS]

EricP: Yes it is aligned.

15:25:43 [DanC]

Zakim, next agendum

15:25:43 [Zakim]

agendum 7. "issue: sort" taken up [from DanC]

15:25:45 [jeen]

Zakim, unmute me

15:25:45 [Zakim]

Jeen should no longer be muted

15:25:49 [ericP]

EricP: yes, needs expanding, not directly contradictory

15:25:54 [kendall]

zakim, mute me

15:25:54 [Zakim]

Kendall_Clark should now be muted

15:26:12 [DanC]

does 1.42 of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/ include Jeen's tests?

15:27:02 [ericP]

ACTION: JeenB to Write a few sort test cases. <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0159.html>

15:27:08 [DanC]

(hardware problems... ew... that's why I want redundancy in the ability to regen the .html)

15:27:18 [DanC]

(andy did or did not get the same answers?)

15:27:21 [SteveH]

DanC, agreed

15:27:24 [ericP]

DanC, DONE?

15:27:33 [DanC]

not sure yet, ericp

15:28:32 [ericP]

q+ to ask if redundant bNodes are smushed

15:28:49 [KevinW]

KevinW has joined #DAWG

15:29:02 [ericP]

AndyS: i can pass some of JeenB's tests, but not all

15:29:06 [ericP]

CONTINUED

15:30:06 [DaveB]

(I've made 1.26 of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ with issues)

15:30:11 [AndyS]

AndyS: Passes for the wrong reasons (failure to check indexes)

15:30:29 [kendall]

hostile irc mutings?! :>

15:30:58 [Zakim]

+Kevin

15:32:14 [jeen]

(andys, checked in fix for test 1, should work now)

15:32:25 [AndyS]

Thanks.

15:32:33 [DanC]

Zakim, next agendum

15:32:33 [Zakim]

agendum 8. "issue: punctuationSyntax" taken up [from DanC]

15:32:44 [kendall]

-groan-

15:33:50 [AndyS]

Pass (with weak testing only)

15:34:15 [ericP]

AndyS: i consider the grammar in bugfix mode

15:35:19 [kendall]

triple-quoted strings, like python? """Hi, I'm a string"""?

15:35:45 [ericP]

SteveH, is there a reason to have WHERE optional?

15:36:35 [DaveB]

I agree with steve on """s, WHERE {} compulsory

15:36:57 [DanC]

ack ericp

15:36:57 [Zakim]

ericP, you wanted to ask if redundant bNodes are smushed

15:37:13 [AndyS]

""" has an issue about line ends :-)

15:37:13 [DanC]

what's the line-end issue?

15:37:22 [kendall]

(just trying to make sure I heard correctly)

15:37:38 [SteveH]

SteveH has joined #dawg

15:37:40 [DanC]

yes, like python, """Hi, I'm a string"""

15:37:57 [kendall]

thx

15:38:50 [ericP]

lots of drop out. DaveB, please scribe.

15:38:51 [AndyS]

DanC: If we have a bare NL in a string, can be \r\n or \n -- Linux or Windows

15:39:03 [DaveB]

just acking that """turtle style""" is ok

15:39:16 [DaveB]

and make these things compulsory: 1) WHERE 2 ) outer {}

15:39:19 [DanC]

yes, an both \r\n and \n have the same impact? ah... no, the don't match the same things. I see.

15:42:41 [DanC]

PROPOSED: that the grammar in 1.326 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ addresses punctuationSyntax

15:42:51 [DanC]

Zakim, who's on the phone?

15:42:51 [Zakim]

On the phone I see DaveB, AndyS, DanC, Yoshio, EricP, Kendall_Clark (muted), [IBM], ??P30, Jeen, Kevin

15:43:01 [DaveB]

detail detail, there's more clashes with turtle in the wd.

15:43:06 [DaveB]

I've not read rq23 since then

15:43:40 [ericP]

DaveB: abstain or neigh

15:44:02 [Janne]

me abstains, too, need to reread - I need to run for tonight to do baby sitting, cu next week

15:44:14 [Zakim]

-??P30

15:44:28 [ericP]

DanC: a lot of people want turtle alignment

15:44:31 [DaveB]

I have no time before next telcon

15:44:41 [ericP]

... makes DaveB (close to) critical path

15:44:53 [Janne]

Janne has left #dawg

15:45:41 [DanC]

EricP: I got LALR [(1)?] problems with {}

15:45:50 [DaveB]

ericP I presently have no conflicts, but I think I ripped out some bits

15:45:52 [ericP]

()

15:45:58 [kendall]

wow, audio is awful

15:48:38 [DaveB]

lol

15:49:49 [Zakim]

-Kendall_Clark

15:51:34 [DanC]

Zakim, agenda?

15:51:34 [Zakim]

I see 3 items remaining on the agenda:

15:51:36 [Zakim]

8. issue: punctuationSyntax [from DanC]

15:51:37 [Zakim]

9. reconsider issue useMentionOp? [from DanC]

15:51:38 [Zakim]

10. test suite maintenance [from DanC]

15:52:43 [DaveB]

let's see, my lexer has 4 states for IDs, prefixes and """-literals x2

15:54:54 [Yoshio]

q+ to say what surprised me in Dave's message was that "." can be understood as a part of a variable name, which grammar is it specified in?

15:54:54 [DanC]

(so Andy, a hunk of java linked from grammar section would be quite resopnsive to my requests.)

15:55:17 [DanC]

(linked fromt the grammar section and published as part of the WD)

15:55:39 [DanC]

next agendum

15:56:17 [DaveB]

I was saying I use approx. first 60 tokens in yacc, then do my own thing in lexer. turtle stuff I threw away and took from my turtle parser/lexer

15:56:26 [DanC]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0154.html

15:56:35 [DanC]

Zakim, close this agendum

15:56:35 [Zakim]

agendum 9 closed

15:56:36 [Zakim]

I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:

15:56:37 [Zakim]

10. test suite maintenance [from DanC]

15:57:06 [ericP]

ideally, i would like a spec that allowed an implementation without being very clever

15:57:31 [SteveH]

+1

15:57:39 [Zakim]

-DanC

15:57:40 [ericP]

ADJOURNED

15:57:45 [Zakim]

-AndyS

15:57:46 [Yoshio]

oh

15:57:47 [Zakim]

-[IBM]

15:57:47 [SteveH]

bye

15:57:48 [Zakim]

-Kevin

15:57:51 [Zakim]

-DaveB

15:58:01 [Zakim]

-Yoshio

15:58:01 [Zakim]

-EricP

15:58:14 [DaveB]

ericP: i've done hopefully all the rf1 changes that I'm going to, over to you

15:58:25 [ericP]

roger that

15:59:12 [Zakim]

-Jeen

15:59:13 [Zakim]

SW_DAWG()10:30AM has ended

15:59:15 [Zakim]

Attendees were DaveB, DanC, AndyS, EricP, Yoshio, Jeen_Broekstra, Kendall_Clark, [IBM], +1.313.346.aaaa, Jeen, Kevin

15:59:58 [jeen]

jeen has left #dawg

16:01:49 [Yoshio]

DaveB? what surprised me in your message was that "." can be understood as a part of a variable name, which grammar is it specified in?

16:02:14 [SteveH]

SteveH has joined #dawg

16:02:24 [Yoshio]

(^_^;)

16:04:01 [DaveB]

DaveB has joined #dawg

16:05:00 [Yoshio]

DaveB? what surprised me in your message was that "." can be understood as a part of a variable name, which grammar is it specified in? (in case you missed what I typed in just before you leave)

16:05:21 [KevinW]

KevinW has left #DAWG

16:05:37 [DaveB]

what grammar? it's in xml qnames I think

16:05:41 [DaveB]

but n3 doesn't like it

16:05:45 [DaveB]

and turtle currently doesn't allow it

16:06:03 [DaveB]

we're moving to allow . in both sparql and turtle

16:06:21 [DaveB]

and use the same xml qnames definition

16:06:47 [Yoshio]

ah, so not yet in the documents

16:07:28 [AndyS]

Any idea of when might there be an updated Turtle spec?

16:08:57 [Yoshio]

hmm, I support having "." as in N3, but not like haveing it as a part of a variable name...

16:09:01 [DaveB]

maybe end of next week but www2005 priorities

16:09:33 [DaveB]

variable names will have additional restrictions

16:09:38 [DaveB]

no '-'

16:09:49 [Yoshio]

agree

16:10:30 [DaveB]

and no '.' says AndyS, I just found his mail to check

16:12:02 [Yoshio]

I'm happy

16:12:14 [Yoshio]

anyway, thanks for clarifying

16:12:39 [Yoshio]

I'll wait for the new syntax

17:59:12 [DaveB]

ha, I found a test bug

17:59:20 [DaveB]

and I agree with ARQ, so it's not my bug

17:59:34 [DaveB]

ex11.2.3.6_0.rq ex11.2.3.6_0.n3

17:59:38 [DaveB]

answer should be

17:59:44 [DaveB]

-----------------------------------------

17:59:44 [DaveB]

| name | mbox |

17:59:44 [DaveB]

=========================================

17:59:44 [DaveB]

| "Alice" | <mailto:alice@work.example> |

17:59:44 [DaveB]

-----------------------------------------

17:59:51 [DaveB]

result file says rs:value "alice@work.example" ;

18:00:00 [DaveB]

it's a uri, not a string

18:05:13 [Zakim]

Zakim has left #dawg

18:06:06 [DaveB]

RRSAgent: please leave us

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

I see 19 open action items:

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: KendallC to work out remaining details in sparqlx.{rnc,xsd,rng}: expression syntax, order-by stuff (xmlAbstractSyntax) [1]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-02

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: AndyS to define a term for abstract form of SPARQL query [2]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-05

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: PatH to internal review of rq23 [3]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-08

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: SteveH to prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no deadline/urgency) [4]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-10

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple [5]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-13

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: EricP to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page [6]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-16

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve [7]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-18

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery) [8]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-21

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: EricP to try out the "2 list of URIs" datasets design from <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0440.html> [9]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-43-32

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: KendallC to ask WSD WG for clarification about HTTP binding of WSDL2, esp lists of URIs [10]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-48-14

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: KendallC to own wsdlAbstractProtocol (based on WSDL description added to protocol to editor's draft). [11]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-49-28

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: KendallC to incorporate EricP's privacy text, salting to taste [12]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-50-24

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: Yoshio to edit saddle descriptions provided by KendallC [13]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T15-04-50

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: kendall to uncommment saddle stuff, email to list [14]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T15-04-55

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: DanC to generate SELECT, CONSTRUCT, ASK protocol traces [15]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T15-06-51-1

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: DaveB to work with EricP to clarify valueTesting proposal [16]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T15-21-20

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: EricP to propose a test re "x"^^mytype != "y"^^mytpe [17]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T15-21-30

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: DanC to send comment on non-use of <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes> to schema comments list [18]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T15-23-46

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: JeenB to Write a few sort test cases. <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0159.html> [19]

18:06:06 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T15-27-02