IRC log of swbp on 2004-06-10
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:52:20 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #swbp
- 13:52:32 [RalphS]
- Meeting: SWBPD WG
- 13:52:39 [RalphS]
- Chair: Guus Schreiber
- 13:52:39 [Benjamin]
- Benjamin has joined #swbp
- 13:52:52 [Benjamin]
- Good afternoon.
- 13:53:05 [RalphS]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/0034.html
- 13:53:32 [RalphS]
- zakim, this will be swbpd
- 13:53:32 [Zakim]
- I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled near this time, RalphS
- 13:53:34 [RalphS]
- zakim, this will be swbp
- 13:53:34 [Zakim]
- ok, RalphS; I see SW_BPD()10:00AM scheduled to start in 7 minutes
- 13:54:02 [danbri]
- hi folks
- 13:54:51 [danbri_scribe]
- danbri_scribe has changed the topic to: SWBPD WG telecon 2004-06-10 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/0034.html
- 13:55:08 [RalphS]
- Previous: 2004-05-27 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004May/0149.html
- 13:57:21 [danbri_scribe]
- (I think some actions may have been lost in the agenda/minutes/agenda trail...)
- 13:58:26 [jacco]
- jacco has joined #swbp
- 13:58:45 [Zakim]
- SW_BPD()10:00AM has now started
- 13:58:52 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 13:59:03 [Zakim]
- +[CWI]
- 13:59:05 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 13:59:06 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 13:59:14 [RalphS]
- zakim, CWI is Guus
- 13:59:14 [Zakim]
- +Guus; got it
- 14:00:31 [libby]
- libby has joined #swbp
- 14:00:55 [guus]
- guus has joined #swbp
- 14:01:10 [Zakim]
- +??P7
- 14:01:42 [aliman]
- aliman has joined #swbp
- 14:01:47 [Zakim]
- +??P9
- 14:01:53 [Zakim]
- +??P10
- 14:01:58 [RalphS]
- zakim, ??p9 is Benjamin
- 14:01:58 [Zakim]
- +Benjamin; got it
- 14:02:04 [RalphS]
- zakim, ??p10 is Alistair
- 14:02:04 [Zakim]
- +Alistair; got it
- 14:02:19 [guus]
- zakim, ??P7 is Alan
- 14:02:19 [Zakim]
- +Alan; got it
- 14:02:21 [RalphS]
- zakim, ??p7 is Alan
- 14:02:21 [Zakim]
- I already had ??P7 as Alan, RalphS
- 14:02:29 [jhendler]
- jhendler has joined #swbp
- 14:02:40 [Zakim]
- +[CWI]
- 14:02:53 [Zakim]
- +Natasha_Noy
- 14:02:53 [RalphS]
- zakim, CWI is Frank
- 14:02:55 [Zakim]
- +Frank; got it
- 14:03:05 [Natasha]
- Natasha has joined #swbp
- 14:03:07 [Zakim]
- +[UMD]
- 14:03:15 [jhendler]
- zakim, [umd] is jimh
- 14:03:16 [Zakim]
- +jimh; got it
- 14:04:49 [guus]
- zakim, who is here?
- 14:04:49 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Ralph, Guus, Alan, Benjamin, Alistair, Frank, Natasha_Noy, jimh
- 14:04:51 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Natasha, jhendler, aliman, guus, libby, jacco, Benjamin, RRSAgent, RalphS, Zakim, danbri_scribe
- 14:04:53 [Zakim]
- +JosD
- 14:05:04 [RalphS]
- Guus: trying the Web irc interface for the first time; it appears to work nicely, especially for those behind a firewall
- 14:05:24 [Zakim]
- +??P19
- 14:05:34 [JosD]
- JosD has joined #swbp
- 14:05:35 [Zakim]
- +??P21
- 14:05:37 [Zakim]
- +DanBri
- 14:05:49 [guus]
- zakim, ??p19 is Brian
- 14:05:49 [Zakim]
- +Brian; got it
- 14:05:51 [RalphS]
- zakim, p21 is Jeremy
- 14:05:51 [Zakim]
- sorry, RalphS, I do not recognize a party named 'p21'
- 14:05:53 [danbri_scribe]
- zakim, DanBri is temporarily Redland
- 14:05:53 [Zakim]
- +Redland; got it
- 14:05:56 [RalphS]
- zakim, ??p21 is Jeremy
- 14:05:56 [Zakim]
- +Jeremy; got it
- 14:06:00 [danbri_scribe]
- zakim, Redland holds DanBri, Libby
- 14:06:00 [Zakim]
- +DanBri, Libby; got it
- 14:06:08 [jjc]
- jjc has joined #swbp
- 14:06:42 [RalphS]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc Web/CGI irc interface
- 14:06:43 [Zakim]
- +??P22
- 14:06:56 [RalphS]
- zakim, ??p22 is Tom_Baker
- 14:06:56 [Zakim]
- +Tom_Baker; got it
- 14:07:06 [bwm]
- bwm has joined #swbp
- 14:07:21 [danbri_scribe]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 14:07:21 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Ralph, Guus, Alan, Benjamin, Alistair, Frank, Natasha_Noy, jimh, JosD, Brian, Jeremy, Redland, Tom_Baker
- 14:07:23 [Zakim]
- Redland has DanBri, Libby
- 14:08:05 [danbri_scribe]
- scribe: danbri
- 14:08:13 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: see web-based irc
- 14:08:14 [RalphS]
- Scribe: DanBri
- 14:08:20 [danbri_scribe]
- ...for thoese w/ firewall problems
- 14:08:45 [danbri_scribe]
- regrets: see list
- 14:08:53 [danbri_scribe]
- propose accept brian's minutes from last time
- 14:09:05 [RalphS]
- Regrets: Gary_NG, David_Norheim
- 14:09:08 [danbri_scribe]
- <RalphS>Previous: 2004-05-27 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004May/0149.html
- 14:09:13 [danbri_scribe]
- ...with two ammendments
- 14:09:21 [danbri_scribe]
- danbri; 2nd'd.
- 14:09:42 [danbri_scribe]
- no oppositions; resolved 2004-05-07 + 2 amendments are a fair record
- 14:09:55 [danbri_scribe]
- next meeting: June 24th
- 14:10:11 [RalphS]
- regrets for 24 June from Guus, DanBri
- 14:10:18 [danbri_scribe]
- jjc: offers to scribe
- 14:10:32 [danbri_scribe]
- agenda review: no AOB/ammendments
- 14:10:33 [RalphS]
- yes, I expect to be available to chair
- 14:10:36 [danbri_scribe]
- Action review:
- 14:10:47 [danbri_scribe]
- Ralph add to the WG home page a note informing the public that they
- 14:10:47 [danbri_scribe]
- are free to write to the WG mailing list and to use the string "comment:" in
- 14:10:47 [danbri_scribe]
- their subject
- 14:10:49 [danbri_scribe]
- DONE.
- 14:10:58 [danbri_scribe]
- ...also to top page of mail archive (a prev action from mar f2f).
- 14:11:16 [RalphS]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/#FreqLinks1
- 14:11:21 [danbri_scribe]
- ...see draft specs bit of doc
- 14:11:57 [RalphS]
- also added to mail archive; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/
- 14:12:06 [danbri_scribe]
- DONE: bwm Propose amendments to the classes as values note.
- 14:12:10 [jhendler]
- ... should also make sure that our "status of this document" sectiion will include the "whre to respond"
- 14:12:27 [danbri_scribe]
- DONE: Ralph get advice on using WG Note vs. Working Draft for early SWBPD
- 14:12:27 [danbri_scribe]
- documents.
- 14:12:40 [danbri_scribe]
- ..advise: a strong advise to use the Working Draft process.
- 14:12:45 [danbri_scribe]
- Also to see updated pubrules page.
- 14:12:54 [danbri_scribe]
- ...there has been a change in definition to what 'rec track' means
- 14:13:22 [danbri_scribe]
- ...any doc that we seek feedback on we should do as a WD, noting intended end-result in Status section (eg. "We expect this to end up as a Note").
- 14:13:36 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: we dicuss this further under 3.
- 14:13:46 [danbri_scribe]
- DONE: guus to provide description of process for publishing notes
- 14:13:53 [danbri_scribe]
- DONE: ralph remind TF leaders they can use intermediate weeks, between WG
- 14:13:53 [danbri_scribe]
- telecons, for TF telecons.
- 14:14:07 [aditya]
- aditya has joined #swbp
- 14:14:20 [danbri_scribe]
- DONE: guus to discuss with Jim Hendler how to push this forward.
- 14:14:27 [danbri_scribe]
- (this was the WRLD TF)
- 14:14:41 [danbri_scribe]
- Ado Prepare summary of Wordnet proposal document, and send to
- 14:14:41 [danbri_scribe]
- Christian after review by the WG.
- 14:14:48 [RalphS]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/0002.html Task Force telecons (Ralph, Thursday, 3 June)
- 14:14:48 [danbri_scribe]
- s/Ado/Aldo/
- 14:15:21 [danbri_scribe]
- bwm: haven't seen the doc yet but there was an updated tf description
- 14:15:25 [danbri_scribe]
- ...assume note the same
- 14:16:02 [libby]
- http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebBestPracticesTaskForceOnApplicationsAndDemos?action=show
- 14:16:05 [danbri_scribe]
- ACTION: Aldo prepare summary of Wordnet proposal doc, and send to Christian after review by WG.
- 14:16:32 [danbri_scribe]
- CONTINUED: libby update task force description
- 14:16:39 [Zakim]
- +??P24
- 14:16:52 [danbri_scribe]
- COMPLETED: libby complete template for applications from the 2003 SW challenge
- 14:16:53 [libby]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/0046.html
- 14:17:11 [libby]
- http://esw.w3.org/mt/esw/archives/cat_applications_and_demos.html
- 14:17:26 [danbri_scribe]
- 'we might need to change this slightly, but not bad. the TF description needs further work'
- 14:17:26 [RalphS]
- zakim, ??p24 is Mike_Uschold
- 14:17:26 [Zakim]
- +Mike_Uschold; got it
- 14:17:51 [danbri_scribe]
- CONTINUED: guus complete template for Finish museums example
- 14:17:58 [danbri_scribe]
- CONTINUED: danbri complete template for FOAF
- 14:18:07 [danbri_scribe]
- CONTINUED: ralph complete template for Annotea
- 14:18:17 [danbri_scribe]
- CONTINUED: libby complete template for web conference photo applications
- 14:18:24 [jjc]
- q+ to discuss ip implications
- 14:18:26 [danbri_scribe]
- 3. WG publication process
- 14:18:28 [danbri_scribe]
- ==============
- 14:18:39 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: brian and I discussed the process for this (re WD/Note/etc).
- 14:19:10 [danbri_scribe]
- ...origianlly we thought WD was REC-track only, but there are now other outcomes (eg. Note)
- 14:19:36 [danbri_scribe]
- jim: how do we express 'this is WD that we no longer thing should go to REC'?
- 14:19:38 [Tbaker]
- Tbaker has joined #swbp
- 14:19:49 [danbri_scribe]
- RalphS: we could publish it as a Note
- 14:19:57 [jjc]
- QAH is an example
- 14:20:03 [danbri_scribe]
- [or a WD w/ a SOTD suggesting new end-state as Note? --danbri thought]
- 14:20:25 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: main thing i take from thread w/ brian... is how do we understand notion of consensus in a non-rectrack wg?
- 14:20:35 [danbri_scribe]
- brian: i was suggesting we don't discuss it too much in the abstract
- 14:20:46 [danbri_scribe]
- ...in your reply, although u used diff words, i think we had a similar sense
- 14:20:51 [jjc]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qa-handbook-20040510/ is QAH
- 14:21:11 [danbri_scribe]
- ...ie that a "can't live with this" attitude is less likely in this WG than in normative recs [such as RDFCore's and OWL's]
- 14:21:13 [danbri_scribe]
- RalphS: yup
- 14:21:15 [danbri_scribe]
- danbri_scribe: yep
- 14:21:23 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: I'll rephrase the proposal
- 14:21:23 [danbri_scribe]
- q?
- 14:21:47 [danbri_scribe]
- jjc: two things to say. one: QA Handbook is an eg of such a WD with an intent to become a WG Note
- 14:21:53 [RalphS]
- [I realize I should have replied to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/0025.html -- will do so later]
- 14:22:00 [danbri_scribe]
- ...they sasy in the status that there'll be a Last Call WD before it goes to Note
- 14:22:23 [danbri_scribe]
- ...also: concern that there has been some discussion in HP re Intellectual Policy issues. The Patent Policy takes 1st WD as a significant milestone.
- 14:22:33 [Zakim]
- jjc, you wanted to discuss ip implications
- 14:22:35 [danbri_scribe]
- On HP's reading we find it unclear quite how it'd work (here)
- 14:23:06 [danbri_scribe]
- ...this is actually generic issue across W3C so we won't make a fuss here, but Patent Policy group should be aware of issue
- 14:23:16 [danbri_scribe]
- ...that WDs are preferred outcomes even for non-RECtrack
- 14:23:50 [danbri_scribe]
- RalphS: as I reviewed the materials I realise I should have replied to Brian. I was also confused on this point. Current version of pubrules clarifies this a bit. I'll send a mail message that explains the clarification as I understand it.
- 14:24:24 [danbri_scribe]
- ...essentially the WD we publish tat states we intend it to end as a Note... the IPR licensing requirements of the PP comes into play only for docs intended to go to REC
- 14:24:35 [danbri_scribe]
- So that bit of language is the key to stop the PP being triggered
- 14:24:36 [bwm]
- brian is happy. Ralph replying here is fine.
- 14:24:36 [danbri_scribe]
- jjc: ok
- 14:24:40 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: glad to hear it
- 14:25:10 [RalphS]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2004/02/02-pubrules.html Publication Rules
- 14:25:17 [danbri_scribe]
- brian: I don't need to be in critical path
- 14:25:26 [jacco]
- jacco is back, frank has left
- 14:25:35 [danbri_scribe]
- ACTION: Guus to revise WD/Note process proposal for Jun24 meeting
- 14:25:45 [RalphS]
- pubrules clarifies how the Status Of This Document in a WD invokes -- or not -- the Patent Policy
- 14:25:53 [danbri_scribe]
- TaskForces
- 14:25:55 [danbri_scribe]
- =========
- 14:25:57 [danbri_scribe]
- cross-tf issues
- 14:26:16 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: Ralph has circulated a TF template, should make it easier to drop them into the Web
- 14:26:44 [danbri_scribe]
- RalphS: great that ppl are archiving these in the mail archives, but really want to get them a single updatable url
- 14:27:11 [jacco]
- zakim, Frank is jacco
- 14:27:11 [Zakim]
- +jacco; got it
- 14:27:22 [danbri_scribe]
- libby: question. re apps/demos tf, we have deliverables but not aiming at a note [re-reads]. oh that's fine.
- 14:27:27 [Tbaker]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Apr/0025.html
- 14:27:32 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: tom's comments on tf list...
- 14:27:41 [danbri_scribe]
- ...its our list of things we want to do or have completed. a living list.
- 14:28:00 [danbri_scribe]
- tom: see my msg in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Apr/0025.html
- 14:28:11 [danbri_scribe]
- ... I look at good pracice in SW re management of a vocabulary
- 14:28:23 [danbri_scribe]
- ...i'm interested in understanding good practice for declaring and managing a simple vocabulary
- 14:28:30 [danbri_scribe]
- ...policies for URIs as term identifiers
- 14:28:48 [danbri_scribe]
- ...DCMI has a namespace policies. Persistence. Institutional commitment. Versioning of terms. Forming URI strings.
- 14:29:10 [danbri_scribe]
- ...it'd be helpful to have some sort of point of reference from SW community, hopefully in line with what we're [DCMI?] doing
- 14:29:18 [danbri_scribe]
- ...2nd set of issues is re versioning terms and term-sets
- 14:29:41 [danbri_scribe]
- ...we've evolved a defacto process, would like to see those move towards a point of ref from sw community
- 14:29:55 [aliman]
- I also think recommendations for change management would be a great thing for the WG to look at
- 14:29:55 [danbri_scribe]
- ...comparision w/ way docs are versioned on w3c website [tr page]
- 14:30:00 [danbri_scribe]
- +1
- 14:30:10 [danbri_scribe]
- ...also sw 'etiquette'
- 14:30:12 [aliman]
- ... (of RDF vocabs)
- 14:30:21 [danbri_scribe]
- ...eg our creation of subproperties
- 14:30:32 [danbri_scribe]
- ...dcmi subpropertying work from library of congress
- 14:30:36 [danbri_scribe]
- ...who is asserting what about what
- 14:30:44 [danbri_scribe]
- ...sort of communication channels should be followed
- 14:30:55 [danbri_scribe]
- ...4th: in documenting a vocabulary
- 14:31:06 [danbri_scribe]
- ...when we add a term to dcmi termset... we update a site, and schema
- 14:31:09 [jjc]
- Zakim, who's on the call?
- 14:31:09 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Ralph, Guus, Alan, Benjamin, Alistair, jacco, Natasha_Noy, jimh, JosD, Brian, Jeremy (muted), Redland, Tom_Baker, Mike_Uschold
- 14:31:11 [Zakim]
- Redland has DanBri, Libby
- 14:31:15 [danbri_scribe]
- ...changes rippple through a number of different types of documentation
- 14:31:33 [danbri_scribe]
- ...would be good for diff sw vocabs to have consistent approach
- 14:31:41 [danbri_scribe]
- ...simple guidelines of good practice for how one does this
- 14:32:01 [danbri_scribe]
- q+ to say yes please! how much time have you got...
- 14:32:23 [danbri_scribe]
- ...[missed] namespace policy and other things associated w/ managing a vocab
- 14:32:34 [libby]
- +1 on reuse of vocabs guidence
- 14:32:52 [danbri_scribe]
- tom: also in another context i'm working on a description of how dcmi approaches the q of versioning terms
- 14:32:58 [danbri_scribe]
- ...dcmi already has a namespace policy
- 14:33:11 [danbri_scribe]
- ...so we have two current stakes in the ground
- 14:33:24 [bwm]
- bwm thinks its great to have a customer telling us what he needs
- 14:33:27 [libby]
- +q to note pointer to some faqs from image workshop related to tom's point
- 14:33:36 [libby]
- q+ to note pointer to some faqs from image workshop related to tom's point
- 14:33:36 [danbri_scribe]
- [I think btw foaf and dcmi approaches v close; foaf approach based on dc experience]
- 14:33:47 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: we discussed this at kickoff meeting
- 14:33:54 [danbri_scribe]
- ...grouped some of these under style conventions
- 14:35:17 [Zakim]
- danbri_scribe, you wanted to say yes please! how much time have you got...
- 14:35:39 [jhendler]
- come on, FOAF only has a few million users -- why should we use that as an example :->
- 14:36:03 [libby]
- http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2004/06/07/2004-06-07.html#1086615887.400193
- 14:36:07 [danbri_scribe]
- danbri_scribe: foaf approach came from dcmi, and we're discussing similar approaches (to versioning) re skos
- 14:36:12 [danbri_scribe]
- ack libby
- 14:36:12 [Zakim]
- libby, you wanted to note pointer to some faqs from image workshop related to tom's point
- 14:36:27 [RalphS]
- DanBri: SWBPD is a good place to pull together implementation experiences from various places
- 14:36:36 [bwm]
- q+
- 14:36:43 [danbri_scribe]
- libby: i'll post ptr to discussion in image context, and also yes i'd be involved
- 14:36:59 [aldo]
- aldo has joined #Swbp
- 14:37:00 [aliman]
- up for looking at change management
- 14:37:03 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: who would want to be in such a Style Conventions TF? (refined to addresss these)
- 14:37:12 [danbri_scribe]
- jim: i don't really think it is style conventions
- 14:37:16 [libby]
- interested in reuse question
- 14:37:20 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: rename
- 14:37:30 [danbri_scribe]
- jim: vocab management
- 14:37:36 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: rename to vocab management
- 14:37:43 [danbri_scribe]
- speaker? Alan?
- 14:37:57 [Natasha]
- */ yes, Alan
- 14:38:03 [libby]
- http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2004/06/07/2004-06-07.html#1086615887.400193 <- faqs fromn image workshop about some of these practical considerations
- 14:38:10 [danbri_scribe]
- ...a lot experience in medical contexts. large vocabs. i'd hope to contribute esp re medical community
- 14:38:11 [Tbaker]
- I like vocabulary management" better than "style conventions"
- 14:38:34 [danbri_scribe]
- jim: same as thesaurus/port TF?
- 14:38:38 [danbri_scribe]
- danbri_scribe: its different
- 14:38:44 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: quite diff but similar issues
- 14:38:59 [RalphS]
- I also think that "Vocabulary Management" better captures the intent of Tom's work
- 14:39:07 [danbri_scribe]
- +1
- 14:39:27 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: I propose s/Style Conventions/Vocabulary Management/ to include Tom's issues from mail
- 14:39:29 [danbri_scribe]
- no objections
- 14:39:32 [danbri_scribe]
- RESOLVED
- 14:39:53 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: who would merge this w/ porting?
- 14:40:03 [danbri_scribe]
- jim: let me take that off, we can think about it later
- 14:40:08 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: who'd be interested?
- 14:40:19 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Ralph add 'Vocabulary Management' to WG home page list of Task Forces under discussion to start
- 14:40:22 [danbri_scribe]
- q+ to ask where "# vs /" is in scope (suggest it is, and a large work item)
- 14:40:25 [Tbaker]
- I would prefer to start after summer.
- 14:40:27 [aliman]
- I would
- 14:40:35 [libby]
- libby would be
- 14:40:51 [danbri_scribe]
- libby, natasha, danbri (after skos is out), al, alan, jim, tom, ...
- 14:41:09 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: 7 is a good sign
- 14:41:12 [danbri_scribe]
- coordinator?
- 14:41:41 [danbri_scribe]
- danbri_scribe: Tom would be natural, but don't want to push u into it...
- 14:41:42 [RalphS]
- [Ralph interested, though has committed to XML datatypes as well]
- 14:42:13 [danbri_scribe]
- tom: [...] good nxt step might be a conference call
- 14:42:14 [danbri_scribe]
- q?
- 14:42:29 [danbri_scribe]
- tom: concerned that we scope it tightly to some achievable objectives
- 14:42:35 [danbri_scribe]
- ...have my own gut feeling
- 14:43:02 [danbri_scribe]
- ack bwm
- 14:43:04 [danbri_scribe]
- q?
- 14:43:08 [Zakim]
- danbri_scribe, you wanted to ask where "# vs /" is in scope (suggest it is, and a large work item)
- 14:43:51 [RalphS]
- DanBri: # vs / seems arcane and boring, but it comes up often
- 14:43:55 [RalphS]
- Guus: that's a nasty one
- 14:44:06 [Tbaker]
- Is "what does the namespace URI 'resolve to'" in scope...?
- 14:44:09 [RalphS]
- DanBri: I'd like this TF to at least summarize the problem
- 14:44:23 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: ok let's proceed w/ telecon
- 14:45:12 [danbri_scribe]
- June17? July1? for an initial discussion about scoping some work in this area.
- 14:45:29 [danbri_scribe]
- tom: if it is tightly scoped and we have a reasonably good sense of what it is trying to achieve
- 14:45:42 [danbri_scribe]
- ...i coould picture myself leading it, w/ some assistance from a veteran
- 14:45:52 [danbri_scribe]
- ...but couldn't commit right now without such a scoping meeting
- 14:45:54 [danbri_scribe]
- jjc: ok fine
- 14:46:07 [danbri_scribe]
- alan: i couldn't make 17th
- 14:46:28 [aliman]
- i can't make either on the phone - maybe make 17th on IRC
- 14:46:30 [danbri_scribe]
- Natasha: i can live w/ the earlier one
- 14:46:51 [RalphS]
- Tom: propose 17 June at 1400 UTC for telecon to discuss scope of Vocab Mgmnt TF
- 14:46:52 [danbri_scribe]
- proposal: June17th, ~45 mins+, this timeslot
- 14:47:04 [danbri_scribe]
- s/this timeslot/1400 utc/
- 14:47:24 [danbri_scribe]
- jim: will be announced on mailing list, but not a full wg telecon
- 14:47:40 [danbri_scribe]
- tom: so process over next week to discuss scoping ideas on call
- 14:47:44 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Ralph get 17 June VOCAB telecon reservation
- 14:47:45 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: exactly :)
- 14:49:07 [danbri_scribe]
- ACTION: libby, natasha, danbri, al, alan, jim, tom, send thoughts/comments re scoping of Vocab management TF work
- 14:49:33 [danbri_scribe]
- ACTION: tom send revised notion of prev posting proposing a scope for vocab management TF
- 14:50:12 [RalphS]
- Topic: World View TF
- 14:50:28 [danbri_scribe]
- jim: I propose dissolution of the World TF
- 14:50:30 [aldo]
- yes I am looking at the irc
- 14:50:34 [danbri_scribe]
- ...we don't need the 'why' but the 'how'
- 14:50:57 [danbri_scribe]
- q+ to note that there are "how" Qs that are inscope for World, as he understood it
- 14:51:10 [jjc]
- q+ to ask for time
- 14:51:20 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: i support this idea
- 14:51:31 [danbri_scribe]
- ...initial discussion of what an onto was dissapeared once we started it
- 14:52:21 [bwm]
- danbri: i remember there was a question about explaining rdfs, owl lite
- 14:52:34 [bwm]
- ... i keep getting questions about that
- 14:52:39 [danbri_scribe]
- ack danbri_scribe
- 14:52:39 [Zakim]
- danbri_scribe, you wanted to note that there are "how" Qs that are inscope for World, as he understood it
- 14:52:42 [bwm]
- jim: we don't know the answer
- 14:52:42 [danbri_scribe]
- ack jjc
- 14:52:42 [Zakim]
- jjc, you wanted to ask for time
- 14:53:03 [danbri_scribe]
- jjc: a procedural point. in HP there was some support for this TF. I'd like to consult HP folks first.
- 14:53:17 [danbri_scribe]
- Jim: [earlier] we could still write articles etc. Many of these Qs ppl on't have answers too
- 14:53:18 [bwm]
- +1 to we have too much going on at present
- 14:53:31 [RalphS]
- [I am more comfortable putting the World View TF on hold]
- 14:53:37 [danbri_scribe]
- danbri_scribe: fine. a different better reason but fine. i agree w/ shutdown or hold.
- 14:53:40 [RalphS]
- [agree on prioritization of resources]
- 14:53:52 [danbri_scribe]
- jim: (to jjc) we can put it on hold rather than close down
- 14:54:25 [danbri_scribe]
- mike g: maybe we could do same thing as w/ vocab management... start to scope out the work possibilities
- 14:54:28 [danbri_scribe]
- ...i could chair a telecon
- 14:54:36 [danbri_scribe]
- jim: my concern is that energy is better spent elsewhere
- 14:54:53 [danbri_scribe]
- mike: what we just heard here, is that it isn't clear just what the tf is/was about
- 14:55:04 [danbri_scribe]
- ...proposing spending an hour of interested parties' time
- 14:55:24 [RalphS]
- s/mike g/mike u/
- 14:55:45 [danbri_scribe]
- [...]
- 14:56:04 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: a lot of pressure to produce nice practical results
- 14:56:07 [RalphS]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004JanMar/0143.html WRLD TF description
- 14:56:11 [danbri_scribe]
- ...things that are easy to get out, howto type of things
- 14:56:30 [danbri_scribe]
- action: jim to message to list proposing the WORLD TF goes on hold
- 14:57:16 [danbri_scribe]
- RalphS: Folks without IRC, dial 41# to be put on a queue by Zakim
- 14:57:25 [danbri_scribe]
- zakim, help
- 14:57:25 [Zakim]
- Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot for more detailed help.
- 14:57:27 [Zakim]
- Some of the commands I know are:
- 14:57:28 [Zakim]
- xxx is yyy - establish yyy as the name of unknown party xxx
- 14:57:30 [Zakim]
- if yyy is 'me' or 'I', your nick is substituted
- 14:57:32 [Zakim]
- xxx may be yyy - establish yyy as possibly the name of unknown party xxx
- 14:57:34 [Zakim]
- I am xxx - establish your nick as the name of unknown party xxx
- 14:57:36 [Zakim]
- xxx holds yyy [, zzz ...] - establish xxx as a group name and yyy, etc. as participants within that group
- 14:57:38 [Zakim]
- xxx also holds yyy - add yyy to the list of participants in group xxx
- 14:57:40 [Zakim]
- who's here? - lists the participants on the phone
- 14:57:42 [Zakim]
- who's muted? - lists the participants who are muted
- 14:57:44 [Zakim]
- mute xxx - mutes party xxx (like pressing 61#)
- 14:57:46 [Zakim]
- unmute xxx - reverses the effect of "mute" and of 61#
- 14:57:48 [Zakim]
- is xxx here? - reports whether a party named like xxx is present
- 14:57:50 [Zakim]
- list conferences - reports the active conferences
- 14:57:51 [Zakim]
- this is xxx - associates this channel with conference xxx
- 14:57:52 [Zakim]
- excuse us - disconnects from the irc channel
- 14:57:53 [Zakim]
- I last learned something new on $Date: 2004/02/17 01:04:28 $
- 14:58:36 [danbri_scribe]
- Wordnet TF
- 14:58:37 [danbri_scribe]
- ========
- 14:58:44 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: Aldo not here
- 14:58:58 [danbri_scribe]
- ...Brian sent mail and some work on the conversion
- 14:59:05 [danbri_scribe]
- (aldo's on irc, not phone?)
- 14:59:17 [danbri_scribe]
- brian: I took Guus' translation and make it into RDF/XML
- 14:59:22 [danbri_scribe]
- ...I only did the RDFS part of it
- 14:59:26 [danbri_scribe]
- ...didn't get to the OWL part of it
- 14:59:46 [danbri_scribe]
- ...also started a draft note as a wrapper for a diagram i made for the schema
- 14:59:53 [danbri_scribe]
- ...i wrote the note then wondered if we'd produce a note
- 15:00:03 [danbri_scribe]
- ...do we need this?
- 15:00:26 [danbri_scribe]
- ...some folks might want the ontology but not the note
- 15:00:41 [danbri_scribe]
- danbri_scribe: an ontology witohut accompanying prose not so useful [so yes pls]
- 15:00:49 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: some detaisl need discussion, eg re word/sense
- 15:00:59 [danbri_scribe]
- q+ to ask aliman's view re relation to skos structures
- 15:01:20 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: [missed proposal]
- 15:01:25 [CGI495]
- CGI495 has joined #swbp
- 15:01:27 [danbri_scribe]
- ...something re discussing multilingual aspects
- 15:01:28 [Zakim]
- -jimh
- 15:01:57 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: propose call on 14:00 July 1st? to discuss wordnet, detailed tech re as-is conversion into rdf
- 15:02:08 [danbri_scribe]
- danbri_scribe: if i can make it i'll be there
- 15:02:10 [danbri_scribe]
- jjc: interested too
- 15:02:17 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: we coould get outsiders involved
- 15:02:36 [danbri_scribe]
- guus: i'd like a wordnet expert there
- 15:03:03 [danbri_scribe]
- ACTION: Guus invite at least 1 wordnet domain expert to a July1st meeting
- 15:03:11 [bwm]
- q+
- 15:03:27 [aldo]
- I agree on July 14th, but I expect to get more drafts in advance, possibly with the help of other TF members ...
- 15:04:29 [Zakim]
- +PatH
- 15:04:33 [jjc]
- july 1
- 15:04:35 [CGI495]
- I just got this to work - thanks to Guss's suggestion. I see a "Say" button which I expect will get his message printed. I do not see a way to get on the queue.
- 15:04:42 [danbri_scribe]
- aldo, we are talking about 1st not 14th?
- 15:04:44 [danbri_scribe]
- 14:00 is 2pm
- 15:05:04 [RalphS]
- 1400 UTC
- 15:05:35 [danbri_scribe]
- ACTION: guus arrange for telecon for july 1st 1400 UTC 60mins on step1 'as is' conversion of Wordnet to RDF/OWL (brian, jjc, guus, danbri, ?aldo, ...)
- 15:05:35 [CGI495]
- This is Mike Uschold, not sure where CGI495 came from.
- 15:05:54 [danbri_scribe]
- (sorry if i missed any intended attendees; it is open to all of us ...)
- 15:06:24 [patH]
- patH has joined #swbp
- 15:06:38 [danbri_scribe]
- aldo, we'll proceed with July1st proposal
- 15:06:38 [danbri_scribe]
- q?
- 15:08:16 [danbri_scribe]
- action: ralph to create a dir for the wordnet tf's ongoing work and give access to brian, ...
- 15:08:16 [danbri_scribe]
- ACTION: ralph to create a dir for the wordnet tf's ongoing work and give access to brian, ...
- 15:08:16 [danbri_scribe]
- ack danbri_scribe
- 15:08:16 [Zakim]
- danbri_scribe, you wanted to ask aliman's view re relation to skos structures
- 15:08:17 [danbri_dna]
- danbri_dna has joined #swbp
- 15:08:21 [aldo]
- uh sorry, ok for July 1st 2pm
- 15:08:55 [RalphS]
- that's July 1 1400 UTC
- 15:09:20 [danbri_dna]
- aldo: i think best to do as-is first, solo, then compare with skos afterwards
- 15:09:23 [danbri_dna]
- ACTION: ralph to create a dir for the wordnet tf's ongoing work and give access to brian, ...
- 15:09:39 [MikeU]
- MikeU has joined #swbp
- 15:10:31 [bwm]
- q?
- 15:10:40 [RalphS]
- [both 17 June and 1 July telecons are now in the telecon calendar; http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20040617 ]
- 15:10:46 [danbri_dna]
- danbri_dna: my reply to brian http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/0011.html is as far as i've got re roadmap on thes/port and wordnet stuff
- 15:10:56 [danbri_dna]
- ========
- 15:11:07 [danbri_dna]
- RalphS: ...some small progress
- 15:11:33 [danbri_dna]
- ...new charters will have more explicit language re involvement
- 15:11:53 [danbri_dna]
- jjc: [missed pt re telecon attendance]
- 15:12:05 [danbri_dna]
- ...jjc attending xml schema telecon?
- 15:12:24 [danbri_dna]
- so Ralph's old action continues, ie. that they continue to ask for a volunteer
- 15:12:47 [RalphS]
- XML Schema meets Thursdays, Jeremy: http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1080
- 15:13:00 [danbri_dna]
- ACTION: jjc try to attent an XML Schema WG telecon
- 15:13:14 [danbri_dna]
- jjc: agreement that this is the critical next step
- 15:13:15 [RalphS]
- oh, Fridays also: http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_734
- 15:13:49 [danbri_dna]
- guus: a joint proposal better than us proposing an answer to them, ideally
- 15:13:58 [danbri_dna]
- OEP TF
- 15:14:00 [danbri_dna]
- =====
- 15:14:04 [danbri_dna]
- ...classes as values
- 15:14:14 [danbri_dna]
- guus: Natasha made a 4th version
- 15:14:34 [danbri_dna]
- Natasha: brian and i discussed a version offlist, now a version after that
- 15:14:53 [danbri_dna]
- ...brian at one point suggested a single version should be proposed [?]
- 15:15:14 [danbri_dna]
- brian: i think ... given that a WD is hopefully imminent, we could ask for feedback on designs
- 15:15:22 [danbri_dna]
- ... haven't studied natasha's response yet
- 15:15:31 [danbri_dna]
- ... approach 2 feels to me like a modelling error
- 15:15:52 [danbri_dna]
- ... concern that 1st pub from a BPD WG not having a BP to recommend might be odd
- 15:16:12 [danbri_dna]
- Natasha: re approach i think is best, 4 of the DL alternatives, led me to believe to think we can't recommend a single approach
- 15:16:19 [danbri_dna]
- brian: it'd be good if we could
- 15:16:33 [RalphS]
- [the original text of my XML Schema action was "Ralph to talk with the chair of the XML Schema WG to invite them to join the XSCH TF"
- 15:16:35 [danbri_dna]
- q+ to note that having 1 prefeerred form in later WD could be good
- 15:16:36 [RalphS]
- -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004May/0002.html
- 15:16:37 [RalphS]
- ]]
- 15:16:45 [guus]
- q?
- 15:16:54 [Zakim]
- danbri_dna, you wanted to note that having 1 prefeerred form in later WD could be good
- 15:17:09 [MikeU]
- I would like to get on the queue, how can I do that?
- 15:17:28 [danbri_dna]
- guus: this is more or less ready to go as a WD
- 15:17:30 [jjc]
- you say "q+2
- 15:17:37 [jjc]
- sorry "q+"
- 15:17:43 [danbri_dna]
- Natasha: some discussion on list about appendices
- 15:17:50 [danbri_dna]
- ...am still myself using subjects as examples
- 15:18:12 [danbri_dna]
- ...changing the running example changes flavour of the note
- 15:18:12 [aliman]
- +q to comment on using dc:subject for the classes as values note
- 15:18:22 [danbri_dna]
- MikeU: re multiple alternatives vs a single bp...
- 15:18:31 [danbri_dna]
- ...q is there an advantage to a single approach?
- 15:18:33 [aliman]
- q+ to comment on using dc:subject for the classes as values note
- 15:18:47 [danbri_dna]
- ...if 4 or 5 variants, could make for interop difficulties?
- 15:18:51 [patH]
- q+
- 15:19:24 [danbri_dna]
- brian: natasha, you didn't like my dramatic switch of the example. fair enough. my concern is use of dc:subject...
- 15:19:35 [danbri_dna]
- ...perhaps if we swtich to game parks, and species they contain
- 15:19:38 [danbri_dna]
- q+ re dc:subject
- 15:19:43 [danbri_dna]
- crap
- 15:19:54 [danbri_dna]
- q- dc:subject
- 15:19:57 [danbri_dna]
- q- re
- 15:20:08 [Zakim]
- aliman, you wanted to comment on using dc:subject for the classes as values note
- 15:20:19 [danbri_dna]
- alistair: i wanted to avoid confusion w/ dc subject and the thesaurus area
- 15:20:46 [RalphS]
- DanBri: even stronger, dc:subject has confusing usage
- 15:20:52 [danbri_dna]
- ack path
- 15:20:55 [guus]
- ack pat
- 15:21:20 [danbri_dna]
- patH: responding to mike... if everyone did agree on a common form, sure would be good, but there is no clear candidatre amongst the several alternatives...
- 15:21:30 [danbri_dna]
- ...and if this is a problem, it'll recur in several areas
- 15:21:43 [danbri_dna]
- MikeU: if no clear winner and ... we should choose arbitarily
- 15:21:55 [danbri_dna]
- patH: no, we shouldn't try to lay down an arbitrary law
- 15:21:59 [aliman]
- q+ re levels of notes
- 15:22:05 [danbri_dna]
- ...all it'll do is annoy people
- 15:22:20 [aliman]
- q+ on levels of notes
- 15:22:28 [danbri_dna]
- [his=danbri's]
- 15:22:30 [danbri_dna]
- +1 to pat
- 15:22:59 [danbri_dna]
- Natasha: [re moving fwd] I'd like to postpone publication process and do 1 more cycle changing the example
- 15:23:06 [aliman]
- q+ to comment on levels of notes
- 15:23:16 [danbri_dna]
- guus: i want 1 wd out before the summer
- 15:23:21 [danbri_dna]
- ...we only have 4 notes out
- 15:23:30 [danbri_dna]
- ...classes/values has been most heavily discussed
- 15:23:34 [danbri_dna]
- n-ary some discussion
- 15:23:38 [danbri_dna]
- ...other two not so much
- 15:23:51 [danbri_dna]
- guus: are we going for an initial WD for some of these?
- 15:24:04 [danbri_dna]
- my pref would be for a WD with not just c-as-v but also for eg n-ary
- 15:24:23 [danbri_dna]
- Natasha: re n-ary, probably have a new version in a few days
- 15:24:34 [danbri_dna]
- ...which'll address most of comments, be rather non-controversial
- 15:24:58 [danbri_dna]
- Alan: we've had a question about whether to include material on classes as well as individuals
- 15:25:11 [danbri_dna]
- ...am concerned that classes level stuff gets put out
- 15:25:21 [danbri_dna]
- ...by time it goes out the two should be together
- 15:25:37 [danbri_dna]
- patH: these could go out 1 at a time, but with a common title structure, suggesting a series
- 15:25:52 [danbri_dna]
- ...later on could be integrated into an html multi-doc with a common entry point
- 15:25:57 [danbri_dna]
- ...like tag findings
- 15:26:06 [danbri_dna]
- [supportive noisees from ? ralph, others]
- 15:26:10 [danbri_dna]
- RalphS: its up to us to pick the titles
- 15:26:27 [danbri_dna]
- guus: each time we publish a small thing, have to send announce for public review etc
- 15:26:52 [danbri_dna]
- RalphS: another way to implement pat's approach is as sections of 1 larger doc
- 15:27:01 [danbri_dna]
- guus: that could work
- 15:27:30 [danbri_dna]
- danbri; seems back2 front starting w/ split up doc. break up 1 as it gets unwieldy.
- 15:27:42 [danbri_dna]
- guus: to get done before summer, we'd need a decision next time
- 15:28:20 [danbri_dna]
- Natasha: would be good to have 3 or 4 notes
- 15:28:27 [danbri_dna]
- guus: owl db schema a possible?
- 15:28:43 [danbri_dna]
- guus: we have to make a decision next time to publish as a 1st bundle
- 15:29:12 [danbri_dna]
- ...natasha can propose when ready
- 15:29:31 [danbri_dna]
- ...then we'd nominate reviewer(s) to check it within wg then decide whether to publish directly or after review
- 15:29:41 [danbri_dna]
- ...for each of the 4 notes i'd like someone to take action to be reviewer
- 15:29:48 [danbri_dna]
- ...and say i propose to publish or not
- 15:29:56 [danbri_dna]
- [someone got the definitive list of 4?]
- 15:30:19 [danbri_dna]
- Natasha: will do nary relations, classes as properties
- 15:30:41 [danbri_dna]
- guus: qual cardinality restritions ... will take action
- 15:30:51 [danbri_dna]
- alan: i'll do qcr
- 15:30:56 [danbri_dna]
- guus: i'll do lists of values
- 15:31:00 [danbri_dna]
- [did i get that right?]
- 15:31:05 [danbri_dna]
- qcr may go in 2nd bundle
- 15:32:03 [danbri_dna]
- ...all actioned to propose for publication before next telecon
- 15:32:18 [danbri_dna]
- ACTION: danbri write the actions properly
- 15:32:26 [danbri_dna]
- Thes PORTing TF
- 15:32:26 [danbri_dna]
- ========
- 15:32:40 [danbri_dna]
- aldo: propse we do a schema for standard thesauru
- 15:33:00 [danbri_dna]
- guus: did you take a look at the maryland and amsterdam work?
- 15:33:09 [danbri_dna]
- s/aldo/alistair/
- 15:33:43 [danbri_dna]
- alistair: migration is important but i think we should allow for structures that are outside trad stds too
- 15:34:19 [danbri_dna]
- ADJOURNED
- 15:34:22 [Zakim]
- -Brian
- 15:34:23 [Zakim]
- -Alan
- 15:34:23 [danbri_dna]
- rssagent, bye
- 15:34:24 [Zakim]
- -JosD
- 15:34:24 [Zakim]
- -Natasha_Noy
- 15:34:26 [Zakim]
- -Tom_Baker
- 15:34:29 [Zakim]
- -jacco
- 15:34:30 [Zakim]
- -PatH
- 15:34:32 [Zakim]
- -Jeremy
- 15:34:34 [Zakim]
- -Mike_Uschold
- 15:34:36 [Zakim]
- -Benjamin
- 15:34:40 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 15:34:44 [Zakim]
- -Alistair
- 15:34:44 [Natasha]
- Natasha has left #swbp
- 15:34:49 [Zakim]
- -Guus
- 15:34:52 [Zakim]
- -Redland
- 15:35:11 [Zakim]
- SW_BPD()10:00AM has ended
- 15:35:12 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Ralph, [CWI], Guus, Benjamin, Alistair, Alan, Natasha_Noy, jimh, JosD, Brian, Jeremy, DanBri, Libby, Tom_Baker, Mike_Uschold, jacco, PatH
- 15:39:21 [RalphS]
- rrsagent, bye
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- I see 14 open action items:
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Aldo prepare summary of Wordnet proposal doc, and send to Christian after review by WG. [1]
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T14-16-05
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Guus to revise WD/Note process proposal for Jun24 meeting [2]
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T14-25-35
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph add 'Vocabulary Management' to WG home page list of Task Forces under discussion to start [3]
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T14-40-19
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph get 17 June VOCAB telecon reservation [4]
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T14-47-44
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: libby, natasha, danbri, al, alan, jim, tom, send thoughts/comments re scoping of Vocab management TF work [5]
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T14-49-07
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: tom send revised notion of prev posting proposing a scope for vocab management TF [6]
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T14-49-33
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: jim to message to list proposing the WORLD TF goes on hold [7]
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T14-56-30
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Guus invite at least 1 wordnet domain expert to a July1st meeting [8]
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T15-03-03
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: guus arrange for telecon for july 1st 1400 UTC 60mins on step1 'as is' conversion of Wordnet to RDF/OWL (brian, jjc, guus, danbri, ?aldo, ...) [9]
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T15-05-35
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: ralph to create a dir for the wordnet tf's ongoing work and give access to brian, ... [10]
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T15-08-16
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: ralph to create a dir for the wordnet tf's ongoing work and give access to brian, ... [11]
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T15-08-16-1
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: ralph to create a dir for the wordnet tf's ongoing work and give access to brian, ... [12]
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T15-09-23
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: jjc try to attent an XML Schema WG telecon [13]
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T15-13-00
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: danbri write the actions properly [14]
- 15:39:21 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T15-32-18