ISSUE-32: Protocol-2015 too vaguely worded, probably unnecessary
Protocol-2015 too vague
Protocol-2015 too vaguely worded, probably unnecessary
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SOAP-JMS Binding specification
- Raised by:
- Eric Johnson
- Opened on:
- 2010-03-15
- Description:
- At the moment, Protocol-2015 (http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#Protocol-2015)
states: "The contentType parameter MUST reflect the value specified in the Content-type part header for the first part (the SOAP body, so text/xml or application/xop+xml)"
Items:
#1) Vague: "reflect" is a completely vague word with unclear meaning.
#2) Incorrect: "first part" - should the message be MIME multi-part, the "first part" could be a binary attachment - it does not need to be the actual SOAP message (as we've discussed in previous conference calls and email threads)
#3) Incomplete: "so text/xml or..." - is an incomplete list of possibilities, but its presence in a normative statement implies it is exhaustive.
Particularly on the last item (#3), I don't see that it is actually useful to be exhaustive - if someone comes up with a new SOAP specification that somehow affects the "contentType" parameter, it would be better for everyone if our spec is not overly prescriptive.
Proposal:
Remove the normative statement, as it is not clarifying anything, and it isn't adding any useful normative requirements.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Issue-30, Issue-31: update available (from phil_adams@us.ibm.com on 2010-04-26)
- Agenda for the 2010-04-13 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-04-26)
- Issue-32, Issue-33: update available (from phil_adams@us.ibm.com on 2010-04-26)
- Updated: Agenda for the 2010-04-13 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-04-12)
- Agenda for the 2010-04-13 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-04-12)
- Agenda for the 2010-04-06 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-04-05)
- Re: Agenda for 2010-03-30 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-03-29)
- Agenda for 2010-03-30 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-03-29)
- Re: Agenda for 2010-03-16 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-03-15)
- Agenda for 2010-03-16 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-03-15)
- Re: ISSUE-32 (Protocol-2015 too vague): Protocol-2015 too vaguely worded, probably unnecessary [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-03-15)
- ISSUE-32 (Protocol-2015 too vague): Protocol-2015 too vaguely worded, probably unnecessary [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-03-15)
Related notes:
Opened as per: http://www.w3.org/2010/03/30-soap-jms-minutes.html
Eric Johnson, 6 Apr 2010, 00:48:31Application of resolution approved in 2010-04-27 conf call:
http://www.w3.org/2010/04/27-soap-jms-minutes.html
Display change log