W3C

Semantic Annotations for WSDL WG teleconference

20 Mar 2007

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
AS, CB, CP, CV, JK, JF, JM
Regrets
AM, BNS, EP, JBD, LF, LH, PM, RA, TV
Chair
JacekK
Scribe
Carine

Contents


<ericP> hi all. can't attend, but ping me or call +1.617.258.xxxx if you need me for anything brief

<scribe> Scribe: Carine

<scribe> scribenick: caribou

Approval of minutes

<JacekK> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20070313

JK: no objections, minutes approved

Action Items

<JacekK> ACTION: Eric to upgrade the SPDL page for SAWSDL readers and then work things out with the Usage Guide [PENDING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20070320#action01]

<JacekK> ACTION: JacekK to ping Marin Dimitrov about SAWSDL parser in WSMO Studio [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20070320#action02]

Administrivia

JK: next week call back at normal time for everyone

(noon EST)

JK: I received links from Ajith, paper reference from Carlos, will put them on the website
... send links about other tools

Implementation status

JK: I saw no change since last week
... any news?

Amit: we will release a new version of sawsdl4j
... and something new for Woden before the end of the month
... Karthik will be the primary contact person

JF: update by the end of the month too for our tool

JK: any problems encountered?

JF: what's the timeline for the implementation phase?

JK: so far we have no test report, only a few links. As soon as we get real data we will estimate a schedule

JF: when the implementation report, we can go to proposed Rec ?

JK: if we don't receive other issues, yes
... right now we are only waiting for the implementation report

Claudio: It took me some time to understand the use cases for the WG, sent to Jacek an email about it

JK: I have not checked your email yet, I'll get back to you

Future of the WG

JF: are the topics listed in the summary email you sent sufficiently detailed to go forward?
... do we need concrete proposals?
... e.g. for preconditions and effects

JK: yes, if we give a more detailed proposal, I expect it will speed up the process

JF: like an input document?

JK: yes, it's certainly better to have a starting document
... as opposed to just saying do something between hooks and full logic framework
... same for other points of the list

Amit: we try to do a registry and we need P&E, is a document saying this useful?

JK: stating the need is one point, a document with a starting point for a solution is better
... priority is on the implementation report so far
... anybody who cares about the points listed in the summary email, do something about it
... ADJOURNED

Summary of Action Items

[PENDING] ACTION: Eric to upgrade the SPDL page for SAWSDL readers and then work things out with the Usage Guide [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20070320#action01]
 
[DONE] ACTION: JacekK to ping Marin Dimitrov about SAWSDL parser in WSMO Studio [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20070320#action02]