See also: IRC log
<ericP> scribe: Amit
<ericP> scribenick: AmitJohn
jacek: minutes approved
... the team will make both older minutes
<ericP> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/25-semann-minutes and http://www.w3.org/2006/07/25-semann-minutes should now be world-readable
<JacekK> ACTION: EricP and JacekK to draft an RDF mapping section for SAWSDL [PENDING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060815#action01]
<JacekK> ACTION: EricP to add text gravy to his annotated Amazon WSDL and put it in Examples document [PENDING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060815#action02]
<JacekK> ACTION: Rama to come up with a text explaining "best practice" for the categorization issue [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060815#action03]
jacek: action 3 marked as completed
discussed Turino attendence
joel: one item outstanding - what to do with the schema file
jacek: we will dicuss issue 22 later and get to that problem later
<JacekK> ACTION: JacekK to send editorial comments to editors [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060815#action04]
joel: send me the editorial comments pls'
jacek: main document seems to be ok except for the comments
rama: main change to the document is the focus on annotations
... all is not there but the change is for the better
<bns> this will be adjusted
rama: we have to sync up the main doc and the wsdl examples
... I have 2 submissions - one from telco italia and one from Eric
... they should go as appendix ?
... we need the time to read and figure out where it would go
Eric: have a new page to publish the other documents
carlos: thanks for the revamp
rama: can fix the things by middle of next week
Jacek: by 24th docs will be frozen
... aim to publish after the f2f
... mantions the publishing process
... we will be able publish in the first 4 days of september
<ericP> i see no moratoria in september
rama: not sure whether I have enough time to give feedback
jacek: could I suggest that we move the new element to an appendix
Joel: we do not want to promote the use of the element outside WSDL 1.1
jacek: I think we can leave it where it is right now
... can we put a note not to validate against the probably buggy schema
Eric: are we willing to share atterExtension with other specs?
... and may i tell XML Core?
the namespace is currently the SA-WSDL namespace for it
<ericP> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/quotedXML *intended* namespace for Quoted XML Namespace
Jacek: the issue will be closed as resolved last telcon
<JacekK> ACTION: EricP to let XMLCore know about attrExtensions element [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060815#action05]
rama: I've sent some details on the categorization issue
amit: some ontologies may not have the notion of category!
rama: we provide a non-normative way of doing a categorization if the users want
jacek: I don't think we are not introducing a hard notion of category
amit: I'll look at the example and we'll talk more about this later
Jacek: it does not seem correct that a categorization pn an interface will also apply into an operation
... users can create categorization at any level
issue 26 remains open
<JacekK> ACTION: JacekK to summarize discussion on issue 26 on mailing list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060815#action06]