See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 25 April 2006
<scribe> Meeting: Databinding WG Teleconference
Date: 25 April 2006
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Apr/0010.html
minutes of the 18th approved
Working Group welcomes newest WG member - Otu Ekanem from BT acting as an alternate to JonC.
OtuHi! I'll be helping practically test patterns with toolkits.
reminder of F2F coming up - Origo is approx 20 minutes by taxi from the city centre - next to the airport
<Yves> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/databinding/actions/open
Yves: retired counter example for ISSUE-7
<Yves> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/issues/ (now public)
tony: will take on PaulB's action
pauld: we have a new issue from Jonc regarding toolkits supported. Will discussion next week.
<scribe> ACTION: aranabah to find technique for finding schemas which contain constructs beyond those described by our XPAths [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/25-databinding-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-34 - Find technique for finding schemas which contain constructs beyond those described by our XPAths [on Ajith Ranabahu - due 2006-05-02].
george: Axis 1.3 took first
element from choice
... other tools also had difficulties, latest versions may give
a better experience
Ajith: resolved in Axis 2, but not sure about Axis 1.3 is working how users expect
pauld: response Peter Cordell whose tool supports choice on the list. I offered an alterate pattern
george: pattern not good enough - we like to use schemas in a validatation context too
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Apr/0017.html
discussion of xs:choice, difficulty of using a construct not well supported by tools but useful in schemas
George: especially in a validation context
Tony, George: choice is fundamental to our schemas
George: but doesn't work well with some tools
pauld: proposes his option (1) with the suggestion of option (2) as a possible alternative for choice
RESOLUTION: ISSUE-33 closed with pauld's proposal optiions 1 + down played option (2)
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/testsuite/documents/all/
pauld: code generation works well, but confidence is only going to come from running the service - do tools honor sequences, consume randomly ordered alls?
pauld: do others have experience with this area?
tony: we use maxOccurs of values other than unbounded
george: our schemas use values other than unbounded
<scribe> ACTION: pdowney to practically test maxOccurs="n" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/25-databinding-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-35 - Practically test maxOccurs=\"n\" [on Paul Downey - due 2006-05-02].
Tony: pushed an example HL7 (with HL7 board permission) to the list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Apr/0035.html
George: will try to provide example schema containing representitive patterns from Origo
pauld: has a set of schema collected from the wild by Henry and Michael, will look at building tests around the patterns therein