W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire Should the Audio WG publish a new public Working Draft of Web Audio API (July 2012)

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: team-audio@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2012-07-09 to 2012-07-15.

8 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Do you agree to publish a new public WD of the Web Audio API spec?

1. Do you agree to publish a new public WD of the Web Audio API spec?

The last public WD of the webaudio spec was published on 15th March 2012. In accordance with the "heartbeat requirement" we suggest to publish a new snapshot of the draft in the public repository of W3C technical reports, and sollicit feedback from the public.

Please indicate whether you agree (yes), disagree (no) with the publication, whether you will go along with the group's decision (concur) or abstain. You may use the rationale field for details about your answer.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
yes 7
no
concur 1
abstain

Details

Responder Do you agree to publish a new public WD of the Web Audio API spec?Rationale
Gabriel Cardoso concur
Olivier Thereaux yes
Marcus Geelnard yes
Adrian Bateman yes Microsoft supports publishing regular Working Drafts to demonstrate forward progress. Supporting publication does not imply we agree with all the technical content in a particular draft.

A survey seems like a high overhead for measuring consensus to publish - perhaps this could be done in mail in future? See, for example, CfC mails in WebApps.
Chris Rogers yes There have been many edits since the 15 March publication, so now seems like a great time to get these changes published.
Chris Wilson yes
Doug Schepers yes Substantive changes have been made to the spec, and it's good to let the community see progress.
James Wei yes

More details on responses

  • Gabriel Cardoso: last responded on 9, July 2012 at 09:18 (UTC)
  • Olivier Thereaux: last responded on 9, July 2012 at 09:18 (UTC)
  • Marcus Geelnard: last responded on 9, July 2012 at 09:38 (UTC)
  • Adrian Bateman: last responded on 9, July 2012 at 14:35 (UTC)
  • Chris Rogers: last responded on 9, July 2012 at 19:05 (UTC)
  • Chris Wilson: last responded on 9, July 2012 at 20:45 (UTC)
  • Doug Schepers: last responded on 9, July 2012 at 22:40 (UTC)
  • James Wei: last responded on 10, July 2012 at 01:07 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Chris Lilley
  2. Don Brutzman
  3. Glen Shires
  4. Eric Carlson
  5. Jer Noble
  6. Matthew Gregan
  7. Matthew Paradis
  8. Adam Goode
  9. Takashi Toyoshima
  10. Christoph Guttandin
  11. Paul Adenot
  12. Anthony Onumonu
  13. Chris Needham
  14. Hongchan Choi
  15. Michel Buffa
  16. Varun Singh
  17. Yanling Feng
  18. Rodrigo Sanchez-Pizani
  19. Efi Lakka
  20. Athanasios Malamos
  21. changqing yan
  22. Wei Dai
  23. Michael Wilson
  24. Alvin Ji
  25. Minji Kim

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.