W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire ISSUE-139: HTML5 spec mentions Microdata in Acknowledgements - Straw Poll for Objections

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.

This questionnaire was open from 2011-03-10 to 2011-03-17.

1 answer has been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Objections to the Change Proposal to move a sentence from the W3C HTML5 spec into the Microdata spec
  2. Objections to the Change Proposal for no change because it's a waste of time.

1. Objections to the Change Proposal to move a sentence from the W3C HTML5 spec into the Microdata spec

We have a Change Proposal to move a sentence from the W3C HTML5 spec into the Microdata spec. If you have strong objections to adopting this Change Proposal, please state your objections below.

Keep in mind, you must actually state an objection, not merely cite someone else. If you feel that your objection has already been adequately addressed by someone else, then it is not necessary to repeat it.

Details

Responder Objections to the Change Proposal to move a sentence from the W3C HTML5 spec into the Microdata spec
Henri Sivonen I object to the Chairs adopting this change proposal, because I object to allowing the use of the Process in a way that's wasteful of the group's time by escalating trivialities. Adopting this CP would reward the escalation of trivialities and set a bad precedent.

I also object to this change proposal, because its Positive Effects imply that not having Microdata be perceived as part of HTML5 is positive and I disapprove of efforts that try to exclude Microdata from HTML5.

2. Objections to the Change Proposal for no change because it's a waste of time.

We have a Change Proposal to make no change because it's a waste of time.

Keep in mind, you must actually state an objection, not merely cite someone else. If you feel that your objection has already been adequately addressed by someone else, then it is not necessary to repeat it.

Details

Responder Objections to the Change Proposal for no change because it's a waste of time.
Henri Sivonen

More details on responses

  • Henri Sivonen: last responded on 16, March 2011 at 13:38 (UTC)

Everybody has responded to this questionnaire.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.