@@@ status - this document is being edited by Jeremy Carroll, and has not been approved by the WG.
This table summarizes the disposition of comments on the GRDDL Test Cases Last Call, of 2 May 2007. and the GRDDL, Candidate Recommendation, of 2 May 2007.
Comment | Commentator | WG Responses | Closure | Summary of Changes |
---|---|---|---|---|
2007AprJun/0102 | Beckett | 2007AprJun/0103 , 2007AprJun/0104 | awaiting closure | regenerated manifest, bugfix submitted for RDFLib |
2007AprJun/0100 | Booth | wrong list | posted in error | |
2007AprJun/0078 | Booth | open | issue-dbooth-3: Ambiguity | |
2007AprJun/0074 | Booth | 2007AprJun/0098 | satisfactorily addresses issue-dbooth-9c | New informative text in new appendix (TODO) |
2007AprJun/0072 | Booth | 2007AprJun/0075 | I am satisfied | warning text in primer (TODO) |
2007AprJun/0069 | Booth | 2007AprJun/0096 | 2007AprJun/0108 closed to my satisfaction | New informative text, concerning this use case, in new appendix (TODO) |
discussion thread on RDFa |
Fonseca Torres Alexander Hausenblas Adida |
2007AprJun/0091 | None required. | Not a formal comment. |
2007AprJun/0054 | Fonseca | 2007AprJun/0056 | I'm fine with your response | No changes. |
2007AprJun/0053 | King | 2007AprJun/0055 | awaiting response | No changes. |
2007AprJun/0052 | Booth | response from editor | unused variable removed | |
2007AprJun/0051 | Beckett | 2007AprJun/0093 | Thanks for the clarifications. | No changes to specs. Bugs in non-WG GRDDL transforms, reported to their authors. |
2007AprJun/0030 | XML Query WG and XSL WG | 2007AprJun/0041, 2007AprJun/0092 | awaiting response | New test added. |
2007AprJun/0028 | Booth | 2007AprJun/0029 | (answered to my satisfaction) | Editorial |
The new appendix was motivated not only by comments from Booth, but also from WG discussion.
This table summarizes the disposition of last call comments on the GRDDL Specification, of 2nd March, 2007.
Comment | Commentator | WG Responses | Closure | Summary of Changes |
---|---|---|---|---|
2007AprJun/0015 | SW Deployment WG | 2007AprJun/0021 | go ahead and publish | No change. |
2007AprJun/0016 (namespace doc) | Berrueta | 2007AprJun/0022 | awaiting response | Two editorial changes. |
2007AprJun/0003 (namespace doc) | Beckett | 2007AprJun/0004 2007AprJun/0019 | Yes it does address my concerns | Comment against the GRDDL namespace document, not the specification. Editorial changes to the namespace document will be made during the CR phase. |
2007AprJun/0003 (whitespace) | Beckett | 2007AprJun/0006 | Great | Clarifying text |
2007AprJun/0003 (other) | Beckett | 2007AprJun/0023 | all the significant concerns are addressed | Misc. editorial. |
2007JanMar/0079 | Carroll | 2007AprJun/0007 2007AprJun/0005 | addressed | Misc. editorial. |
2007JanMar/0068 which langs? | Mazzocchi | 2007AprJun/0000 2007AprJun/0014 | I remove my dissatisfaction | clarification in primer |
2007JanMar/0068 output formats? | Mazzocchi | 2007AprJun/0000 | solves my previous issues entirely | added tests illustrating use of <xsl:output> |
2007JanMar/0071 | Harold | 2007JanMar/0078 2007JanMar/0081 | none | added clarifying test |
2007JanMar/0075 | Hammond | 2007JanMar/0076 2007AprJun/0002 | none | No spec change; added RDF syntax/graph diagram to primer |
2007JanMar/0080 no comment | XML Schema WG | none | thank you | none |
Other changes have been made during last call, laregly to clarify the impact of some of the more obscure parts of the normative dependency chain, in response to Working Group discussion. Almost all of these were areas in which the early implementations did not implement the other specifications correctly, this largely motivates the decision to have a call for implementations, as opposed to transitioning straight to Proposed Recommendation. Specific messages, raising such issues, on the WG list include: