This is a rough playing space for my ideas on illustrating concepts, as a way of understanding how to provide better information about it in the Web Content Accessibiltiy Guidelines. Feedback should be sent to the WCAG working group's mailing list. Please look at the archives for relevant threads.
This page was last updated at $Date: 2002/07/11 00:04:58 $ to include new images and Charles McCathieNevile produced it and may or may not have time to maintain it.
Note that if you are using Internet Explorer it seems not to support HTML 4 (according to user feedback), so I am still working on ways to make this page work properly for browsers that do and work better for that browser.
Comments on these are welcome - please add them to the existing thread on these illustrations. I intend to update them, at the very least to include metadata pointing to the different alternative forms. But I don't know when.
So the checkpoint itself (as drawn from the 14 August draft version) might appear something like:
Note to reviewers: This item is under discussion and does not have consensus. We do not have something acceptable for the draft at this time. Comments and suggestions are welcome. Refer to the issues list for more information.
Non-text content includes images, text in raster images, image map regions, animations (e.g., animated GIFs), applets and programmatic objects, ascii art, scripts, images used as list bullets, spacers, graphical buttons, sounds (played with or without user interaction), stand-alone audio files, audio tracks of video, and video. Note to reviewers: this definition is under discussion. Suggestions are welcome.
Sounds, graphics, videos and animations can help make concepts presented in a Web site easier to understand, especially for people with cognitive, reading, or learning disabilities or those who are unfamiliar with the language of the text of the site.
"Designers need to be cautious in deciding when to use illustrations. Reading a picture is probably a learned activity that is easier for some than others. Some users skip the pictures; others read only the pictures. Designers must also recognize that visual conventions are not universal and that individuals develop their own mental schema and expectations in interpreting visual information.
For a detailed discussion of guidelines pertaining to illustrations, consult Tufte (1983) and MacDonald-Ross (1977)." Robert W. Bailey, Ph.D., Human Performance Engineering, 3rd edition.] pg 431.
There are examples in different media of the proposed checkpoint 3.4 in the 31 July draft of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. One is a pair of images:
http://www.w3.org/2001/08/mmcmn/34a.png This is a cartoon. On the left is a person looking in confusion at a poster of text. On the right the text has had images added to explain it, and "the light has dawned" - the person now understands the poster. The left hand panel has been crossed out indicating it is not the right approach, and the right hand panel has a tick indicating that it is a good approach.
and
http://www.w3.org/2001/08/mmcmn/34b.png
This is another cartoon. On the left is a person looking in confusion at a poster of Some figures. On the right the figures have been presented also as a chart to help explain them. Again, the left hand panel has been crossed out indicating it is not the right approach, and the right hand panel has a tick indicating that it is a good approach.
There is also a sound file: http://www.w3.org/2001/08/mmcmn/34sound.aif consists of the following text being read:
3.4 Supplement text with non-text content
Some people can't read writing easily, so add images, sounds, movies and so on to help them understand your message