Device Independence Working Group Charter

This charter is written in accordance with section 3.2.3 of the W3C Process.


Table of Contents


Mission statement

The Device Independence Working Group (WG) is a Working Group as defined by the W3C Process. The purpose of this WG is to collect the requirements on Web access with various kinds of devices, study the domain specific issues, find the commonality among the issues, review related specifications within and outside of W3C, and provide the study results and requirements to related activities.

Scope of the work items

Although there are several suggested topics led by discussions at the W3C Workshop on "Web Device Independent Authoring" in October 2000, the WG will focus on the following topics as first work items of the WG.

  1. To discuss, collect and describe requirements on Web access with various kinds of devices including cellular phones, PDAs, car navigation, TV sets, printers etc.
  2. To review Web related specifications for mobile, TV and other devices made outside of W3C.
    This review will include:
  3. To review W3C work with device independence issues in mind. This is done at the requirements stage for new work and in particular during Last Call.
  4. To provide the study results and requirements to related activities in W3C.
  5. To explore how the diverse needs of content providers and consumers for delivery of content across many platforms can be met through the use of appropriate standards, notations, tools and guidelines.

NOTE: If the DI WG discovers compatibility issues with standards or recommendations from other bodies with which there is an ongoing liaison activity, these issues will be put on the agenda of the group in charge of the liaison to find the appropriate solution.

NOTE: The DI WG does not produce W3C Recommendations; it does produce guidelines (as Working drafts and Notes) and reviews. Input and comments on these documents will be solicited from the organizations in charge of the standards in question. This will be done through the coordination channels when they exist.

Criteria for success

One of the main criterion of success for Device Independence WG is to avoid fragmentation of the Web space accessible with various kinds of devices, and make sure that the Web related technologies with various kinds of devices can interoperate with each other or with the existing Web as much as possible.

The other main criterion of success for Device Independence WG is that W3C Recommendations released during the operation of the WG do not contain barriers to Device Independent Web access, and that they enable and promote Web access with various kinds of devices.

Duration

New: The duration of the Device Independent Working Group is extended with approval from the W3C Director to 31 May 2002. This will allow the working group to work on the future new charter of the group.

The Device Independence Working Group is initially chartered for one year, from February 2001 to the end of February 2002, but clearly, the topic is a long term one. Therefore, after one year we will evaluate the achievements, and depending on the results we could propose to recharter the group.

Coordination with other Groups

The Group will have to maintain contacts with many other Groups within W3C as listed below.

In addition, W3C considers proposing a new Multimodal Dialogs activity soon. In such a proposal, the relationship with the Device Independence Activity will be explained and the synergies will be highlighted.

Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI):
To make contents accessible with various kinds of devices, the Device Independence WG will coordinate with the relevant WAI groups, in particular with the Protocols and Formats WG, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines WG , User Agent Accessibility Guidelines WG, and Authoring Tools Guidelines WG on the following points:
Internationalization (I18N) IG/WG:
The Device Independence WG has to take into consideration the requirements on internationalization.
Television and the Web IG:
The TV community shares many technical interests and requirements on device independent Web access, and describing device profiles. The Television and the Web IG is expected to take the role of collecting the requirements on device independence from the TV community.
Mobile Access IG:
The mobile community shares many technical interests and requirements on device independent Web access, and describing device profiles. The Mobile Access IG is expected to take the role of collecting the requirements on device independence from the mobile community.
CC/PP WG:
This Working Group is making specifications for describing device capabilities and user preferences based on RDF. Device Independence WG should look at the work of this WG.
Voice Browser WG:
Voice browsing is an interesting approach with non-PC devices such as mobile terminals. Recently, multimodal Web access is being discussed in the WG which is an important feature for Web access with mobile terminals for instance. Device Independence WG should look at the work of this WG.
HTML WG:
Device Independence WG has to watch XHTML WG trends carefully for modularization/profiling technologies especially the work for constructing lightweight profile namely XHTML Basic, and maintain close contact with the HTML WG.
CSS WG:
Style sheets are very important to realize both scalability and interoperability with various kinds of devices. Device Independence WG has to watch CSS WG especially for modularization/profiling technologies (e.g. CSS3), and maintain close contact with the CSS WG.
Synchronized Multimedia (SYMM) WG:
The bandwidth of the network is expected to be wide enough for multimedia contents/services with small appliances such as mobile terminals. Device Independence WG has to watch SYMM WG trends carefully for modularization/profiling technologies especially the work for constructing lightweight profile namely SMIL Basic Profile, and maintain close contact with the SYMM WG.
P3P Specification and Policy Outreach WG:
With the growth of the Web to include mobile access and service options, it is now necessary to develop a consistent approach to privacy protection that enables both users and service providers to build trust and confidence in user relationships throughout both the wired and wireless Web. Device Independence WG has to watch P3P Specification WG and P3P Policy Outreach WG; and maintain close contact with the WGs. The Mobile Web Privacy workshop may well give a more concrete direction here.
Hypertext CG:
The Hypertext CG is the forum to address the issues that concern several working groups in the Hypertext area, which will strongly related to the Device Independence issues. The Device Independence WG will need to send someone to take part in the Hypertext CG.

Deliverables

The Device Independence WG will produce deliverables, in the form of Working Draft, Notes, internal reviews, or inputs/requirements to other Working Groups. Expected deliverables are as follows:

  1. Requirement document on device independent Web access for related W3C Working Groups.
    The WG will initiate requirements and proposals to other WGs and to W3C work in general. The requirements of the WG will be made available in document taking the form of a W3C Working Draft or Note, and where necessary should be further discussed with the appropriate group in order to find a satisfactory solution. Particularly, if the WG plans to have intermediate versions for review by the community, we publish them in the form of W3C Working Drafts.
  2. Documentation of review results on Web related specifications produced by external bodies in the area of mobile, TV and other devices, including comparison sheets between W3C specifications and other specifications.
    The purpose of the comparison is to study how those Web related specifications could fit into the modularization/profiling technologies in the works being done by W3C. The document may also include reports on issues for transformation or content adaptation with those Web related specifications.
  3. Documentation of review results on W3C work with device independence issues.
    The WG will review the work on W3C specifications at appropriate times, for example when other groups ask for requirements or publish working drafts or requirements document. The findings of the WG can be summarized in documents taking the form of a W3C Working Draft or Note or in an email, and where necessary should be further discussed with the appropriate group in order to find a satisfactory solution. Specifications and groups will be covered as far as the resources of the WG allow it; details are given in the section describing coordination with other groups. Schedules and deadlines must be negotiated with those groups.

Confidentiality

The discussion archives will be open to W3C Members. This charter itself is open to the public.

Coordination with external groups

The following is a list of groups that are known or presumed to be working on or interested in integration of Web technologies into various kinds of devices, including pointers to the respective projects. It will be amended as appropriate.

The coordination mechanisms with the external groups would vary according to the nature of those external groups respectively. Cross membership would be one of the ways to achieve cooperation if both W3C and the external group can agree on the cross membership. The other way of the coordination would be to have invited experts from related external groups (Please see at "the W3C invited experts and collaborators agreement".)

IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force)
IETF is a large open international community of network designers, operators, vendors, and researchers concerned with the evolution of the Internet architecture and the smooth operation of the Internet. It is open to any interested individual.
WAP Forum (Wireless Application Protocol Forum)
WAP Forum is a mobile industry forum that is making specifications and cooperates with W3C.
ATSC (Advanced Television Systems Committee), USA
Broadcast HTML: a proposal of a subset of HTML, CSS and SMIL discussed in the Special Group DTV Application Software Environment (DASE)
ARIB (Association of Radio Industries and Businesses), Japan
BML: a subset of XHTML, CSS with extensions for Japanese Digital broadcast services.
ATVEF (Advanced Television Enhancement Forum), USA
Advanced Television Enhancement Forum Specification: a proposal to subset a number of W3C/IETF standards to create enhanced, interactive television programs.
CEMA (Computer and Electronics Marketing Association), USA
published a specification on how to send URLs over Line21 VBI
DVB (Digital Video Broadcast), Europe
Multimedia Home Platform: An effort to standardize on APIs, content formats etc. to be used by digital set-top boxes.
EBU (European Broadcasting Union)
Webcaster group
ISO MPEG-4
ISO MPEG-7
ISO MPEG-21
A project in its initial phase for adding metadata to audiovisual content. RDF could become relevant in this area.
Television anytime
Organization whose goal is " to encourage the development of TV and related multimedia services based on the use of persistent local storage irrespective of the manner of service delivery".

Milestones

New: a new milestone proposed for the 3 month extension : setting up a new charter with identified work items

These are proposed milestones of this Working Group. Additional milestones may be added when the group decides to take on additional work items.

The publication dates of the documents of review results on W3C work with device independence issues will be decided by the WG after consideration of the progress of other groups. Then a calendar will be posted on the Group page.

February, 2001
Working group kick-off meeting (tentative location: Boston/US)
June, 2001
2nd face-to-face meeting
W3C Working Draft or Note for requirements on Web access with various kinds of devices
September, 2001
3rd face-to-face meeting
review results on Web related specifications produced by external bodies
December, 2001
W3C Working Draft for review results on Web related specifications produced by external bodies
from December 2001 to February, 2002
During this periods, both W3C documents will be maintained and updated when needed
27 February, 2002 (New)
Working Group Extension
15 April, 2002 (New)
Publication of the future DIWG charter to AC representatives
15 May, 2002 (New)
Response to comments
31 May, 2002 (New)
Working Group Completion

Meeting mechanisms

Face-to-face meetings are one day or two day sessions held three times during the period of the WG. Teleconferences are scheduled once per two weeks. To advance the global perspective of the Consortium, face-to-face meetings will be held on at least two separate continents during the year of the Working Group activity. Teleconferences will be scheduled with attention to the time zones in which all WG Members work.

Communication mechanisms

The participants of the Device Independence WG communicate via an archived mailing list, w3c-di-wg@w3.org.

Voting mechanisms

When voting is necessary, it shall proceed per W3C Process.

W3C Team contact (New)

New: From March 1, 2002, the chair of the group is Roger Gimson (HP), and the W3C team contact of this group is Stephane Boyera. Kazuhiro Kitagawa is the alternate staff contact, and Device Independent Activity Lead

The Chair of this Group is Hidetaka Ohto, and the W3C Team contact of this Group is Kazuhiro Kitagawa

Participation

W3C Members

Requirements for meeting attendance and timely response are described in the W3C Process document. Device Independence WG participation (attending meetings, reviewing documents and preparing drafts) is expected to consume one day per week.

For invited experts

Interested individuals, and adaptive technology experts will be sought and welcomed as W3C invited experts to give the Working Group access to the kinds of knowledge required. Especially, the participation from related standard bodies is strongly encouraged. Invited experts are encouraged to adopt the same requirements for meeting attendance and timely response as are required of W3C Members. Invited experts are subject to the same requirement for information disclosure as are required of W3C Members and they have to agree to the W3C invited experts and collaborators agreement.


Hidetaka Ohto, Kazuhiro Kitagawa, Stephane Boyera
Last revised $Date: 2002/03/18 15:07:25 $