Based on non-online notes and the IRC log
1. Roll
Present
BEA Systems, Mark Nottingham
Canon, Herve Ruellan
Iona Technologies, Suresh Kodichath
Microsoft Corporation, Martin Gudgin
Nokia, Mike Mahan
Oracle, Anish Karmarkar
Sun Microsystems, Marc Hadley
W3C, Carine Bourne
W3C, Yves Lafon
Regrets
IBM, Noah Mendelsohn
SAP AG, Volker Wiechers
SeeBeyond, Pete Wenzel
Absent
<none>
Excused
BEA Systems, David Orchard
Canon, Jean-Jacques Moreau
Microsoft Corporation, Jeff Schlimmer
Oracle, Jeff Mischkinsky
Sun Microsystems, Tony Graham
Chair
Mike Mahan
Scribe
Anish Karmarkar
2. Agenda review, and AOB
See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol-wg/2005May/0005.html
Chair: Any additional AOB items?
Chair: No
3. Approval of minutes:
27 April see: http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/5/04/27-minutes.html
Chair: call for approval of minutes
Chair: Approved without objection
4. Review action items, see http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/Admin/#pending.
These action items are taken from the XMLP member page.
2005/03/30: Yves - DONE - Transition PENDING
Request publication of PER documents.
2005/03/30: Yves - DONE
Close issue 29Rec with no action (and send closing email) - talk about this in (5)
2005/03/30: Yves - DONE
Fix issue 28rec (add in errata) and fix also the broken rfc3023 anchor
2005/04/27: MarkN - DONE
Do some research on Rec31 and the use of mime type in XML
2005/05/27: Yves - DONE
Fix issue 32Rec (add in errata) and send closing email.
5. SOAP 1.2 PER specs & MTOM, XOP, RRSHB Recommendation maintenance
Chair: Transition Status and rec issues dependency – Yves
Chair: Lets address this after 29rec and 31rec
Chair: 29Rec: Private pushback – Yves
Yves: asked to send the comment to the public list
Yves: pushback from Simone Kissane
Yves: he wants the section to be moved to the appendix
Yves: he pushed back privately, not publically
Yves: I have asked for him to post his reply on the public comments list
Yves: still no action on Simone's part
Chair: is the opinion of the WG to ignore this pushback unless this is made public?
WG: no response
Chair: Yves what is the procedure for this?
Yves: here isn't any procedure for this, since it is not public. Will ask.
Chair: there isn't any new argumentation from Simone is his private correspondence
Yves: this isn't important – it is a misreading of the spec
ACTION: Yves to investigate W3C process related to Simon's private email
Chair: inlined to leave this as status quo and move on
Chair: Topic: Transition Status and rec issues dependency
Chair: Yves, can you address the linkage between pubishing ER and these rec issues
Yves: Yves: we need to be sure that we won't have an errata right after we publish
Gudge: mark baker has said that he does not expect anything. Do we need to do anything?
Chair: he did start off by framing the argument that way
Chair: but he continues to technically argue the issue
Chair: since he has framed it that way, can we close it as such?
Yves: there are several arguments. Noah has send an email about it. We can close the issue with no action based on Noah's email
Chair: OK – does the WG agree to close 31rec based on Noah's arguments
WG: agrees
Chair: Volunteer to write closing email
Gudge: I volunteer
ACTION: Gudge to send closing email for 31rec
Chair: Yves, given successful closing of 29rec and 31rec, can we transition now to ER?
Yves: yes
Chair: Very good, can we push on this to happen soon?
Yves: next week at best
Chair: we shall wait for some XOP/MTOM/RRSHB comments prior to calling the next XMLP meeting
6. AOB
Chair: AOB?
WG: no
Chair: meeting adjourned