1. Roll call
------------
Present 14/10
- BEA Systems, Mark Nottingham
- BEA Systems, David Orchard
- Canon, Herve Ruellan
- IBM, David Fallside
- IBM, Noah Mendelsohn
- IBM, John Ibbotson
- IONA Technologies, Seumas Soltysik (Scribe)
- Oracle, Anish Karmarkar
- SAP AG, Volker Wiechers
- SeeBeyond, Pete Wenzel
- Sun Microsystems, Marc Hadley
- Sun Microsystems, Tony Graham
- Systinet (IDOOX), Jacek Kopecky
- W3C, Carine Bournez
Excused
- Canon, Jean-Jacques Moreau
- IONA Technologies, Mike Greenberg
- Oracle, Jeff Mischkinsky
- Systinet (IDOOX), Miroslav Simek
- W3C, Yves Lafon
Regrets
- DaimlerChrysler R. & Tech, Mario Jeckle
- Ericsson, Nilo Mitra
- Microsoft Corporation, Martin Gudgin
- Microsoft Corporation, Jeff Schlimmer
- SAP AG, Gerd Hoelzing
Absent
- DaimlerChrysler R. & Tech, Andreas Riegg
2. Agenda Review and Additional Suggested Agenda Items
------------------------------------------------------
F2F this fall
*Should consider another F2F for this Fall
*Time late November/early December
*Discussion of venue to be handled via email
David F-Carine to keep recommendation doc up to date
Update Normalization Document Proposal(Marc Hadley)
*Intermediary could add new header element
*If normalization header element empty then remove element
*Action Item-prepare new version of Normalization doc(By COB 9/19/2003)
3. Approval of September 10 minutes
-----------------------------------
*Minutes are approved without objection
4. Review of Pending Action Items
---------------------------------
A)Action items complete except for the following
*MarkN & DavidF-Confirm on the exact name of the content type (ietf vs vnd) (Pending)
*Anish to reformulate UC-4 as a requirement. (Pending)
5. Status reports
-----------------
A)Registration of media type: MarkN reports it is now on IESG's discussion agenda
B)Comments on PASWA doc
*Action Item-MarcH to kick off thread to discuss Phillipe Hegaret's email on binary in XML Schema
C)Oasis WS Security Tech Committee(published 3 specs)
*Looking for somebody to review specs from WS Security TC that use SOAP extensions to provide SOAP message integrity and authentication
*Action Item-Marc Hadley volunteers to review docs by 3 October 2003
6. Attachments
--------------
A) SOAP OS Reqs doc
*comments (remove WD formatting etc) are in process of being handled
B) Report on XQDMTF from Noah
*Task Force looked at query data model. Draft MTOM using terminology of data model. Task force met to consider proposal of using XQDMTF as part of MTOM doc.
*Two decision made
1)Decided to publically review draft.
2)Concensus among task force members to adopt XQDMTF
*Discussion-
Mark N-Postpone decision. Will this confuse MTOM users?
Noah-Downside SOAP described by infoset, therefore there is confusion between infoset and XQDMTF.
Mark N-Leaves door open for discussing other aspects of data model beyond Base64
C) XInclude
*Discussion
Mark-on track for what needs to be said to XML Core WG
David F-note timetable is to send comments after next telcon
D) Use Cases
UC-2
*Discussion
Jack-Applicaton wishes to send uri which receiver will de-reference. Sender can bundle resource with message in addition to sending URI.
Noah-Not happy with language associated with WWW not being accessible. Include examples of where packaging resource with message are useful.
Mark N-Agree with Noah.
David F-Action Item-Jack reformulate language associated with sending resource with message in addition to URI sent by sender.
David F-Record of reformulation of UC2 is now in the IRC log.
David F-Reminder that decision still needs to be made about publishing UC-2.
UC-6
MarkN - Will we support this use case in MTOM?
*Discussion
Jack-This is a useful use case for HTTP binding. Should be limited to large data sets.
Mark N-Any issues/implications other than buffer management? This is highly implementation specific.
Noah-A little shy about specifying this to implementations. More research into buffer management issues before recommending anything. Should we set up a task force or not do anything on this issue?
David F-Decision made to not have task forces for use cases.
David F-Action Item-Start a thread to start a reformulated version of UC6(Jack)
David F-More action needed on the item.
UC-7
*Discussion
WG decides to drop UC-7 because it already exists as a requirement.
UC-8
*Discussion
Mark N-This is subsumed by other use cases.
WG decides to drop UC-8
Action Item-DavidF send email consolidating all Use Cases (and resolve any internal references amongst UC's)