public-webapps-github@w3.org from June 2024 by date

Tuesday, 11 June 2024

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TAG review for web app `scope_extensions` (Issue #875) Diego Gonzalez
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Trusted types attributes (PR #1268) Luke Warlow
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Trusted types attributes (PR #1268) Luke Warlow
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Trusted types attributes (PR #1268) Luke Warlow
• Re: [whatwg/dom] `MutationObserver` flag to observe mutations in (open) shadow trees to facilitate polyfills of HTML syntax (Issue #1287) Lea Verou
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Local Peer-to-Peer API (Issue #932) Matthew Tylee Atkinson
• Re: [whatwg/dom] `MutationObserver` flag to observe mutations in (open) shadow trees to facilitate polyfills of HTML syntax (Issue #1287) smaug----
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] `noopener-allow-popups` value in COOP (Issue #964) Yoav Weiss
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] `noopener-allow-popups` value in COOP (Issue #964) Martin Thomson
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Requirement for AbortSignal argument to be named 'signal' can be confusing for some APIs. (Issue #1112) M.K.
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTPS upgrades proposal (PR #1655) meacer

Monday, 10 June 2024

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Updated review of WebNN API (Issue #933) Reilly Grant
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Requirement for AbortSignal argument to be named 'signal' can be confusing for some APIs. (Issue #1112) Dominic Farolino
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Requirement for AbortSignal argument to be named 'signal' can be confusing for some APIs. (Issue #1112) M.K.
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Requirement for AbortSignal argument to be named 'signal' can be confusing for some APIs. (Issue #1112) M.K.
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Fix a typo (PR #968) Lea Verou
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Fix a typo (PR #968) Lea Verou
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Fix a typo (PR #968) Lea Verou
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [meta] Use automatic links where available (PR #1316) Mattias Buelens
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [meta] Use automatic links where available (PR #1316) Mattias Buelens
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow `new Response` with 101 status code (Issue #1759) Benjamin Gruenbaum
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [meta] Use automatic links where available (PR #1316) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [meta] Use automatic links where available (PR #1316) Mattias Buelens
• [whatwg/streams] [meta] Use automatic links where available (PR #1316) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Updated review of WebNN API (Issue #933) Daniel Appelquist
• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Update 'Creating a sequence from an iterable' to use new iterator AOs (PR #1409) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Update 'Creating a sequence from an iterable' to use new iterator AOs (PR #1409) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Update 'Creating a sequence from an iterable' to use new iterator AOs (PR #1409) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Update 'Creating a sequence from an iterable' to use new iterator AOs (PR #1409) Linus Groh
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow `new Response` with 101 status code (Issue #1759) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow `new Response` with 101 status code (Issue #1759) Benjamin Gruenbaum
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: SelectorObserver (Issue #1285) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: SelectorObserver (Issue #1285) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Update 'Creating a sequence from an iterable' to use new iterator AOs (PR #1409) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Intent to use Constants (Issue #1410) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow `new Response` with 101 status code (Issue #1759) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow `new Response` with 101 status code (Issue #1759) A-yon Lee
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Early Design Review: Opener Protections (Issue #916) Peter Linss

Sunday, 9 June 2024

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Editorial: fix `lang` description (PR #1133) Christian Liebel
• Re: [whatwg/dom] matchMedia-like API for element matches (Issue #1225) Carlos Vieira
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Fix a typo (PR #968) Addison Phillips
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Editorial: fix `lang` description (PR #1133) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Editorial: fix `lang` description (PR #1133) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Editorial: fix `lang` description (PR #1133) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow `new Response` with 101 status code (Issue #1759) Benjamin Gruenbaum
• [whatwg/fetch] Allow `new Response` with 101 status code (Issue #1759) Benjamin Gruenbaum
• [whatwg/webidl] Intent to use Constants (Issue #1410) Roithnac

Saturday, 8 June 2024

• Re: [whatwg/streams] ReadableStream.prototype.text(), .blob(), and .bytes() (PR #1311) James M Snell
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] `caches` global property should not be available in Dedicated/Shared WorkerGlobalScope with {credentials: 'omit'} (Issue #1721) BlobTheKat
• Re: [w3c/manifest] [DRAFT—DO NOT MERGE/REVIEW] Add members for localization (PR #1101) Addison Phillips
• [w3c/manifest] Editorial: fix language tag description (#1083) (PR #1134) Christian Liebel
• [w3c/manifest] Editorial: fix `lang` description (PR #1133) Christian Liebel
• Re: [w3c/manifest] [DRAFT—DO NOT MERGE/REVIEW] Add members for localization (PR #1101) Christian Liebel
• Re: [w3c/manifest] [DRAFT—DO NOT MERGE/REVIEW] Add members for localization (PR #1101) Christian Liebel
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: elementsFromRect() (Issue #1286) Anne van Kesteren
• [whatwg/webidl] Update 'Creating a sequence from an iterable' to use update iterator AOs (PR #1409) Linus Groh

Friday, 7 June 2024

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: elementsFromRect() (Issue #1286) Justin Fagnani
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: elementsFromRect() (Issue #1286) Justin Fagnani
• Re: [w3c/manifest] مانفیست (Issue #1132) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/manifest] مانفیست (Issue #1132) majed khajeh
• Re: [w3c/manifest] [DRAFT—DO NOT MERGE/REVIEW] Add members for localization (PR #1101) Addison Phillips
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Editorial: cite UAX9 not BIDI (PR #1131) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Editorial: cite UAX9 not BIDI (PR #1131) Christian Liebel
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Editorial: cite UAX9 not BIDI (PR #1131) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] [DRAFT—DO NOT MERGE/REVIEW] Add members for localization (PR #1101) Christian Liebel
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Editorial: cite UAX9 not BIDI (PR #1131) Christian Liebel
• [w3c/manifest] Editorial: cite UAX9 not BIDI (PR #1131) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Reference to BIDI should probably use SpecRef reference to UAX9 (editorial) (Issue #1081) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/manifest] HTML Tidy action broke (Issue #1130) Marcos Cáceres

Thursday, 6 June 2024

• Re: [w3c/manifest] More restrictive standalone mode (#770) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] More restrictive standalone mode (#770) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Transparent Bottom Navigation Bar (#804) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Transparent Bottom Navigation Bar (#804) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Obtaining the manifest from any context (#818) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Obtaining the manifest from any context (#818) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] [DRAFT—DO NOT MERGE/REVIEW] Add members for localization (PR #1101) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Create test suite to check Web App Manifest feature support (#666) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Create test suite to check Web App Manifest feature support (#666) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add a means to associate a PWA with a file extension (#626) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add a means to associate a PWA with a file extension (#626) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest processing should not be a function of document URL (#668) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest processing should not be a function of document URL (#668) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Design Review: Prioritized Task Scheduling (big picture) (Issue #967) Scott Haseley
• Re: [w3c/manifest] [DRAFT—DO NOT MERGE/REVIEW] Add members for localization (PR #1101) Daniel Murphy
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Value `auto` for `dir` probably shouldn't say "no explicit directionality" (Issue #1079) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] fix: dir's auto definition (PR #1118) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] fix: dir's auto definition (PR #1118) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] fix: dir's auto definition (PR #1118) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] fix: dir's auto definition (PR #1118) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] fix: dir's auto definition (PR #1118) Daniel Murphy
• Re: [w3c/manifest] fix: dir's auto definition (PR #1118) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] fix: dir's auto definition (PR #1118) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] fix: dir's auto definition (PR #1118) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] fix: dir's auto definition (PR #1118) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] fix: dir's auto definition (PR #1118) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] fix: dir's auto definition (PR #1118) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Icon purpose "any" is confusing (Issue #1094) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Remove problematic icon matching algorithm (PR #1120) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Remove problematic icon matching algorithm (PR #1120) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Remove problematic icon matching algorithm (PR #1120) Daniel Murphy
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest id should strip fragment at parse time (Issue #1121) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Processing steps for id now removes the fragment (PR #1122) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Processing steps for id now removes the fragment (PR #1122) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Processing steps for id now removes the fragment (PR #1122) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Processing steps for id now removes the fragment (PR #1122) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Add vendorId, productId, name attributes (PR #202) Kagami Sascha Rosylight
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Spec review for scheduler.yield() (Issue #966) Scott Haseley
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Early design review: scheduler.yield() (Issue #827) Scott Haseley
• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Callbacks in namepsaces? (Issue #1408) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Callbacks in namepsaces? (Issue #1408) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add field: public key (certificate) (#930) darkdragon-001
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Specification review for fenced frames (Issue #838) Shivani Sharma
• Re: [whatwg/dom] `MutationObserver` flag to observe mutations in (open) shadow trees to facilitate polyfills of HTML syntax (Issue #1287) Lea Verou
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (PR #99) Mustaq Ahmed
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (PR #99) Mustaq Ahmed
• [whatwg/webidl] Callbacks in namepsaces? (Issue #1408) Francisco Ryan Tolmasky I
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (#49) Mustaq Ahmed
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (#49) Mustaq Ahmed
• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Mrta (Issue #1407) Anne van Kesteren
• [whatwg/webidl] Mrta (Issue #1407) Duytran7878
• Re: [w3c/manifest] fix: dir's auto definition (PR #1118) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add field: public key (certificate) (#930) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add field: public key (certificate) (#930) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] meta: see web almanac for any insights about manifest usage (#987) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [w3c/manifest] meta: see web almanac for any insights about manifest usage (#987) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] [META] Ajust dfn-for of events on XHREventTarget (PR #389) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] [META] Ajust dfn-for of events on XHREventTarget (PR #389) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Fix outdated HTML PR link (PR #1758) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Web Manifest Overrides (Issue #1045) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Web Manifest Overrides (Issue #1045) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Feature Request: Shortcuts categories (#922) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Single-window mode option (#597) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Processing steps for id now removes the fragment (PR #1122) Marcos Cáceres

Wednesday, 5 June 2024

• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Provide more information about movementX/Y for unadjusted movements (Issue #98) Reilly Grant
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (PR #99) Vincent Scheib
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (PR #99) Alvin Ji
• [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (PR #99) Alvin Ji
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (#49) Mustaq Ahmed
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Fix outdated HTML PR link (PR #1758) Luca Casonato
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Definition of Powerful Features (Issue #451) Jeffrey Yasskin
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] improvements to <details> styling (widget structure) (Issue #965) L. David Baron
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] [META] Ajust dfn-for of events on XHREventTarget (PR #389) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] [META] Ajust dfn-for of events on XHREventTarget (PR #389) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Definition of Powerful Features (Issue #451) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] [META] Ajust dfn-for of events on XHREventTarget (PR #389) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] [META] Ajust dfn-for of events on XHREventTarget (PR #389) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] [META] Ajust dfn-for of events on XHREventTarget (PR #389) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Fix outdated HTML PR link (PR #1758) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] [META] Ajust dfn-for of events on XHREventTarget (PR #389) Anne van Kesteren
• [whatwg/xhr] [META] Ajust dfn-for of events on XHREventTarget (PR #389) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] `noopener-allow-popups` value in COOP (Issue #964) Yoav Weiss
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Ensure "race-network-and-fetch-handler" is used with a fetch handler (PR #1719) Yoshisato Yanagisawa
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Deferred fetching (PR #1647) Ming-Ying Chung
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Side effects due to tree insertion or removal (script, iframe) (#808) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Use a queue of deferred steps in the node insertion algorithm (#732) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Introduce DOM post-connection steps (PR #1261) Anne van Kesteren
• [whatwg/fetch] Fix outdated HTML PR link (PR #1758) Luca Casonato
• Re: [whatwg/dom] `MutationObserver` flag to observe mutations in (open) shadow trees to facilitate polyfills of HTML syntax (Issue #1287) smaug----
• [w3c/permissions] Definition of Powerful Features (Issue #451) Daniel Appelquist
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] ServiceWorkerAutoPreload (Issue #963) Shunya Shishido
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Deferred fetching (PR #1647) Ming-Ying Chung
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Ensure "race-network-and-fetch-handler" is used with a fetch handler (PR #1719) Domenic Denicola

Tuesday, 4 June 2024

• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Make it possible to read image/svg+xml from the clipboard (#92) snianu
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Add SVG format to the spec. (PR #216) snianu
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Add SVG format to the spec. (PR #216) Edgar Chen
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Captured Surface Control (Issue #962) Elad Alon
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Add SVG format to the spec. (PR #216) snianu
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Add bytes() method for reading bytes into a Uint8Array (PR #370) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Expose IndexedDB IDBObjectStore.purge() method (Issue #420) Andrea Giammarchi
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Expose IndexedDB IDBObjectStore.purge() method (Issue #420) Andrea Giammarchi
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Add vendorId, productId, name attributes (PR #202) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Expose IndexedDB IDBObjectStore.purge() method (Issue #420) nickchomey
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Expose IndexedDB IDBObjectStore.purge() method (Issue #420) Evan Stade

Monday, 3 June 2024

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Reference Target (Issue #961) Dan Clark
• Re: [whatwg/dom] `MutationObserver` flag to observe mutations in (open) shadow trees to facilitate polyfills of HTML syntax (Issue #1287) Lea Verou
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Add SVG format to the spec. (PR #216) Sanket Joshi
• [w3c/clipboard-apis] Add SVG format to the spec. (PR #216) snianu
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker verification (Issue #1720) Alvaro
• Re: [WICG/webcomponents] Proposal: Custom attributes for all elements, enhancements for more complex use cases (Issue #1029) Christopher Keers
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add process model processing for the "Priority" header. (PR #1757) Patrick Meenan
• [whatwg/fetch] Add process model processing for the "Priority" header. (PR #1757) Patrick Meenan
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define behavior for `Priority` request header (Issue #1718) Valentin Gosu
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define behavior for `Priority` request header (Issue #1718) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define behavior for `Priority` request header (Issue #1718) Patrick Meenan
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Selection.direction spec issue, what should happen on multiple click? (Issue #177) Simon Pieters
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (#49) Mustaq Ahmed
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define behavior for `Priority` request header (Issue #1718) Armin Sebastian
• Re: [whatwg/dom] `MutationObserver` flag to observe mutations in (open) shadow trees to facilitate polyfills of HTML syntax (Issue #1287) smaug----
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define behavior for `Priority` request header (Issue #1718) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define behavior for `Priority` request header (Issue #1718) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define behavior for `Priority` request header (Issue #1718) Patrick Meenan
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define behavior for `Priority` request header (Issue #1718) Valentin Gosu
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define behavior for `Priority` request header (Issue #1718) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker verification (Issue #1720) Sean4572435243
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Introduce DOM post-connection steps (PR #1261) Dominic Farolino
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "A status is a code" doesn't actually mean anything (#1142) Anne van Kesteren

Sunday, 2 June 2024

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker verification (Issue #1720) Alvaro
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Controller Documents v1.0 (Issue #960) Manu Sporny
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define behavior for `Priority` request header (Issue #1718) Patrick Meenan
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define behavior for `Priority` request header (Issue #1718) Armin Sebastian
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "A status is a code" doesn't actually mean anything (#1142) Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Support import() local code in extension service worker (Issue #1700) Gabriel Garrett

Saturday, 1 June 2024

• Re: [WICG/webcomponents] "open-stylable" Shadow Roots (#909) Rob Eisenberg
• Re: [WICG/webcomponents] "open-stylable" Shadow Roots (#909) Renann Prado
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker verification (Issue #1720) Alvaro

Last message date: Tuesday, 11 June 2024 13:02:38 UTC